Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate
- Edited by:
- Adelino Cattani,
- Bruno Mastroianni,
Will there be any ‘happy dispute’ again? A debate among people holding different opinions that does not end with a repetition of the initial idea, but rather with an improvement of one’s own beliefs and those of others? In order to achieve this, we need to rely on education which, through deliberative debate training activities, can foster the development of rhetorical and dialectical skills (the ability to persuade and compete) as well as critical thinking and open-mindedness (living together and cooperating). A number of scholars from around the world reflect on the topic both from a theoretical point of view – the significance of debate in a hyperconnected society – and from a practical point of view, the application of educational models and tools to measure their effectiveness.
- Keywords:
- Argumentation Theory,
- Deliberative debate,
- Rhetoric,
- Education,
- Debate,
- DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1
- Series: Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
- Scientific Board
- Language: English, Italian
- Subjects: Philosophy Education
University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-7626-3593
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-5071-762X
Bruno Mastroianni, philosopher, journalist, and communication consultant. Research Fellow at the University of Florence, is external faculty member within the master’s degree program in Institutional Advertising, communication and events organization. He is the author of La disputa felice (Cesati, 2017) and Litigando si impara (Cesati, 2020).
Ideas
Bruno Mastroianni
From the Virtues of Argumentation to the Happiness of Dispute- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.25-41
Applications
Claudio Fuentes Bravo, Julián Goñi Jerez
Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.69-86
Jan Albert van Laar
Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.87-98
pp.99-118
Gianmarco Tuccini, Goffredo Guidi
Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.119-127
Gianluca Simonetta
Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.129-143
Caterina Gabrielli
Filosofia e dibattito. Le Meditazioni Cartesiane come esempio di deliberazione filosofica- CC BY 4.0 |
- © Author(s)
-
pp.145-161
- Publication Year: 2021
- Pages: 168
- eISBN: 978-88-5518-329-1
- Content License: CC BY 4.0
- © 2021 Author(s)
- Publication Year: 2021
- Pages: 168
- ISBN: 978-88-5518-328-4
- Content License: CC BY 4.0
- © 2021 Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Book Title
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate
Editors
Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni
Peer Reviewed
Number of Pages
168
Publication Year
2021
Copyright Information
© 2021 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Publisher Name
Firenze University Press
DOI
10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1
ISBN Print
978-88-5518-328-4
eISBN (pdf)
978-88-5518-329-1
Series Title
Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
Series ISSN
2975-1152
Series E-ISSN
2975-1233
News and Events
Export Citation
Suggested Books
