This paper was written in Spanish for a conference in Seville. Plutarch, Table Talks 3.6 is an important source of information about what Epicurus, in his Symposion, as well as the Stoic Zeno and the Pythagorean Clinias (in philosophical works now equally lost), had to say on this peculiar question, which is also addressed in other classical texts, both in prose (Xenophon) and in poetry (Homer, Menander). A philological analysis of the passage deals with a number of problems posed by the transmitted text, leading to new proposals and improvements, as well as to a better appreciation of Plutarch’s anti-Epicurean stance (pursued by using to his best advantage the opening lines of Menander’s Misoumenos).
University of Florence, Italy
Titolo del capitolo
La hora del amor (Quaest. Conv. 3.6): Plutarco y la traditión (literaria y filosófica)
Autori
Angelo Casanova
Lingua
Spagnolo
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6.14
Opera sottoposta a peer review
Anno di pubblicazione
2025
Copyright
© 2025 Author(s)
Licenza d'uso
Licenza dei metadati
Titolo del libro
I miei scritti su Plutarco
Sottotitolo del libro
Raccolti, riveduti e corretti con bibliografia unificata
Autori
Angelo Casanova
Opera sottoposta a peer review
Numero di pagine
366
Anno di pubblicazione
2025
Copyright
© 2025 Author(s)
Licenza d'uso
Licenza dei metadati
Editore
Firenze University Press
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6
ISBN Print
979-12-215-0823-9
eISBN (pdf)
979-12-215-0824-6
eISBN (xml)
979-12-215-0825-3
Collana
Studi e saggi
ISSN della collana
2704-6478
e-ISSN della collana
2704-5919