- Idee di lavoro e di ozio per la nostra civiltà
- Edited by Giovanni Mari, Francesco Ammannati, Stefano Brogi, Tiziana Faitini, Arianna Fermani, Francesco Seghezzi, Annalisa Tonarelli
Otium e otiosi nella riflessione dei teologi-giuristi della prima modernità (XVI-XVII sec.)
- Luisa Brunori
- © 2024 Author(s) |
- CC BY 4.0
- DOI: 10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.27
Fifteenth- and seventeenth-century theologians-jurists, and in particularthe Early Modern Scholastics, are confronted with the issue of otium as a real problem, not just as an object of rhetorical speculation. They question the role of the idler within human communities where otium is made possible by an increasingly widespread financial economy (the numerous 'capitalist' investors in the new transatlantic trades are emblematic of this), but where such idleness also becomes an absolutely pressing social issue when it comes to the idleness suffered, especially in cities where large numbers of people without any occupation flow in from the countryside. Added to these problems is the issue of 'natural' idleness, which, in the eyes of observers of the time, seems to be a peculiar characteristic of the american natives.
- Keywords:
- early modern era,
- financial economy,
- poverty,
- american natives,
- remuneration,
Paris Nanterre University, France - ORCID: 0000-0002-6591-153X
- Avendaño, Diego. 1668. Thesaurus Indicus, vol. I. Antverpiae: Meursius. Edizione digitale su The School of Salamanca. A Digital Collection of Sources <https://id.salamanca.school/texts/W0001> (2024-03-15).
- Báñez, Domingo de. 1594. De Iure et Iustitia Decisiones. Salamanca: Andreas Renaut Ioannes Renaut.
- Blank, Andreas. 2015. “Domingo de Soto on Justice for the Poor.” Intellectual History Review 25: 136-46.
- Coronelli, Renato. 2005. “Origine e sviluppo del precetto domenicale e festivo.” Quaderni di diritto ecclesiale 18: 228-58.
- Decock, Wim. 2017. “Social Crisis and the Rule of Law.” Rivista internazionale di diritto comune 28: 159-78.
- Faitini, Tiziana. 2020. “Shaping the Profession: Some Thoughts on Office, Duty, and the Moral Problematisation of Professional Activities in the Counter-Reformation.” Journal of Early Modern Christianity 7: 177-200.
- Fumaroli, Marc, édité par. 2011. L’otium dans la République des lettres. Paris: Alain Baudry & Cie.
- Garrán Martínez, José María. 2004. La prohibición de la mendicidad: la controversia entre Domingo de Soto y Juan de Robles en Salamanca (1545). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
- Ghisalberti, Alessandro. 2013. “Il dibattito sulla schiavitù naturale in Bartolomé de Las Casas.” Studi Umanistici Piceni 33: 181-94.
- Jones-Davies, Marie-Thérèse, édité par. 2002. L’oisiveté au temps de la Renaissance. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
- Lessius, Leonard. 1605. De Iustitia et de Iure. Anversa: Johannes Masius.
- Lugo, Juan de. 1642 (1652). Disputationum De Iustitia et De Iure. Lione: Haeredes Petri Prost, Philippi Borde [et] Laurentii Arnaud.
- Martz, Linda. 1983. Poverty and Welfare in Habsburg Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Molina, Lui de. 1593-1609. De Iustitia et de Iure. Cuenca-Venezia-Mainz: Ioannis Masselini-Sessas-Schönwetterus.
- Muñoz Garcia, Àngel. 2003. Diego de Avendaño (1594-1698): filosofía, moralidad, derecho y política en el Perú colonial. Lima: UNMSM, Fondo Editorial.
- Pollini, Pierluigi. 1982. “Bartolomé De Las Casas e J. Ginés Sepùlveda di fronte alla questione della libertà degli indios.” Rivista Di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 74, 2: 343-54.
- Santolaria Sierra, Félix F. 2003. El gran debate sobre los pobres en el siglo XVI: Domingo de Soto y Juan de Robles 1545. Barcelona: Ariel.
- Secchi Tarugi, Luisa, a cura di. 2021. Otium e negotium nel Rinascimento: atti del 31. Convegno internazionale. Firenze: Franco Cesati.
- Solórzano Pereira, Juan de. 1629. De Indiarum Iure et gubernatore, vol. I. Madrid: Francisco Martinez.
- Soto, Domingo de. 1545 (2022). In causa pauperum deliberation. Deliberation on the Cause of the Poor, edited by Jeremiah Lasquety-Reyes, Joost Possemiers, Daniel Schwartz, and Wim Decock. Grand Rapids: Clp Academic.
- Soto, Domingo de. 1553-1554. De Iustitia et de Iure, Salamanca: Andrés de Portanaris.
- Tellkamp, Jörg. 2004. “Esclavitud, dominio y libertad humana según Domingo de Soto.” Revista española de filosofía medieval 11: 129-37.
- Tosi, Giovanni. 2002. Veri domini o Servi a natura? La dottrina della schiavitù naturale nel dibattito sul Nuovo Mondo. Divus Thomas, vol. 105, no. 3, 2002, 9–258.
- Vitoria, Francisco de. 1557. Relectiones Theologicae XII, vol. I. Lugduni: Iacobum Boyerium.
- Vives, Juan Luis. 1526. De subventione pauperum. Sive de humanis necessitatibus libri II. Bruges: Hubertus de Crook.
- Vives, Juan Luis. 1528. De institutione feminae christianae, Valencia: Jorge Costilla.
Chapter Information
Chapter Title
Otium e otiosi nella riflessione dei teologi-giuristi della prima modernità (XVI-XVII sec.)
Authors
Luisa Brunori
Language
Italian
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.27
Peer Reviewed
Publication Year
2024
Copyright Information
© 2024 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Bibliographic Information
Book Title
Idee di lavoro e di ozio per la nostra civiltà
Editors
Giovanni Mari, Francesco Ammannati, Stefano Brogi, Tiziana Faitini, Arianna Fermani, Francesco Seghezzi, Annalisa Tonarelli
Peer Reviewed
Number of Pages
1894
Publication Year
2024
Copyright Information
© 2024 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Publisher Name
Firenze University Press
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7
ISBN Print
979-12-215-0245-9
eISBN (pdf)
979-12-215-0319-7
eISBN (epub)
979-12-215-0320-3
Series Title
Studi e saggi
Series ISSN
2704-6478
Series E-ISSN
2704-5919