1. Barca, Fabrizio. 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Brussels: European Commission.
2. Bianchi, Alessandra, and Stefania De Medici. 2023. “A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness.” Sustainability 15, 6: 5127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065127 DOI: 10.3390/su15065127
3. Bullen, Peter A. 2007. “Adaptive Reuse and Sustainability of Commercial Buildings.” Facilities 25, 1/2: 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710716911 DOI: 10.1108/02632770710716911
4. Bullen, Peter A., and Peter E. D. Love. 2011. “Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings.” Structural Survey 29, 5: 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439 DOI: 10.1108/02630801111182439
5. Community Rail Network. s.d. “The Value of Community Rail.” https://communityrail.org.uk (2026-05-27).
6. Copus, Andrew, Francesco Mantino, and José Noguera. 2017. “Inner Peripheries: An Oxymoron or a Real Challenge for Territorial Cohesion?” Italian Journal of Planning Practice 7, 1: 24–49.
7. Davoudi, Simin. 2003. “Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: From an Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda.” European Planning Studies 11, 8: 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431032000146169 DOI: 10.1080/0965431032000146169
8. Douglas, James. 2006. Building Adaptation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
9. European Commission. 1999. ESDP: European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
10. Ferraro, Attilio, Emanuela D’Andria, and Pierfrancesco Fiore. 2025a. “Experiences of Participatory and Shared Co-Design: The Metaplan Method for a ‘Possible City’ in Calitri (AV), Italy.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Ar.Tec. (Scientific Society of Architectural Engineering), 336–352. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71867-0_23 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-71867-0_23
11. Ferraro, Attilio, Emanuela D’Andria, and Pierfrancesco Fiore. 2025b. “Analysis of Adaptive Reuse Models for Abandoned Built Heritage in Small Towns of Inland Areas: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities.” In Imagining the Future: Designing and Building for People and the Environment, 305–327. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 764. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06974-0_16 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-06974-0_16
12. Fundación de los Ferrocarriles Españoles. s.d. “Vías Verdes.” https://www.viasverdes.com (2026-05-27).
13. Fundación Vía Verde de la Sierra. s.d. “The Sierra Greenway.” https://www.viasverdes.com (2026-05-27).
14. Langston, Craig, Francis K. W. Wong, Eddie C. M. Hui, and Li-Yin Shen. 2008. “Strategic Assessment of Building Adaptive Reuse Opportunities in Hong Kong.” Building and Environment 43, 10: 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017 DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017
15. Latham, Derek. 2000. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury: Donhead Publishing.
16. OECD. 2018. Rural 3.0: A Framework for Rural Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
17. Pedata, Luigi, Paola Altamura, and Marco Rossi. 2024. “Turning Heritage Railway Architecture into an Infrastructure for Ecological Transition.” Sustainability 16: 1–24.
18. Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad Van Cleempoel. 2019. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. London: Routledge.
19. UNESCO. 2011. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. Paris: UNESCO.
20. Vennbahn. s.d. “Discover the Vennbahn.” https://www.vennbahn.eu (2026-05-27).
21. Yin, Robert K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche