1. Anstey, Peter R. 2005. “Experimental vs Speculative Natural Philosophy.” In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Peter R. Anstey, and John A. Schuster, 215–42. Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Ariew, Roger. 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bayle, Pierre. 1999–2019. Correspondance de Pierre Bayle, édité par Anthony McKenna et al. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
4. Boyle, Robert. 1999–2000. The Works of Robert Boyle, edited by Michael Hunter, and Edward B. Davis. London: Pickering and Chatto.
5. Clarke, Desmond. 1989. Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Del Prete, Antonella. 2018a. “Malebranche-Spinoza, aller-retour. Le parcours polémique de Pierre-Sylvain Régis.” In Spinoza-Malebranche. À la croisée des interprétations, sous la direction de Raffaele Carbone, Chantal Jaquet, et Pierre-François Moreau, 161–78. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
7. Del Prete, Antonella. 2018b. “Polémiques manifestes et influences tacites: Régis, Malebranche et la conscience.” In Le Malebranchisme à l’épreuve de ses amis et de ses ennemis, édités par Elena Muceni, et Maria-Cristina Pitassi, 129–48. Paris: Honoré Champion.
8. Del Prete, Antonella. 2019. “The Prince of Cartesian Philosophers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 374–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Del Prete, Antonella. 2023. “Wandering into Régis’s Système: Some Remarks on his Theory of Causation and the Mind/Body Union.” In Philosophie et scepticisme de Montaigne à Hume. Mélanges en l’honneur de Gianni Paganini, sous la direction d’Anthony McKenna, et Gianluca Mori, 261–73. Paris: Honoré Champion.
10. Des Chene, Dennis. 2002. “Cartesian Science: Régis and Rohault.” In A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Steven Nadler, 183–96. Malden: Blackwell.
11. Descartes, René. 1647. Les principes de la philosophie, traduits par Claude Picot. Paris: De l’Imprimerie de Pierre Des-Hayes.
12. Descartes, René. 1964–19742 (1897–1913). Oeuvres, éditées par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery, édition révue par Joseph Beaude, Pierre Costabel, Alan Gabbey, et Bernard Rochot (“AT”). Paris: J. Vrin.
13. Dobre, Mihnea. 2013. “Rohault’s Cartesian Physics.” In Cartesian Empiricisms, edited by Mihnea Dobre and Tammy Nyden, 203–26. New York: Springer.
14. Dobre, Mihnea. 2019. “Jacques Rohault and Cartesian Experimentalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Delphine Antoine Mahut, 388–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Dobre, Mihnea. 2020. “Jacques Rohault’s Mathematical Physics.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10: 414–39.
16. Du Roure, Jacques. 1654. La philosophie divisée en toute ses parties. Paris: Chez François Clouzier.
17. Hobbes, Thomas. 1642. Elementorum philosophiae sectio tertia de cive. Paris: s.n.
18. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von. 1923–. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe (“A”). Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: De Gruyter.
19. Levitin, Dmitri. 2005. “Early Modern Experimental Philosophy. A Non-Anglocentric Overview.” In Experiment, Speculation and Religion in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Alberto Vanzo, and Peter R. Anstey, 229–91. New York-London: Routledge.
20. McClaughlin, Trevor. 1996. “Was There an Empirical Movement in Mid-Seventeenth Century France? Experiments in Jacques Rohault’s Traité de Physique.” Revue d’histoire des sciences 49: 459–81.
21. McClaughlin, Trevor. 2003. “Descartes, Experiments, and a First Generation Cartesian, Jacques Rohault.” In Descartes’ Philosophy, edited by Stephen Gaukroger, and John Schuster, 330–46. New York: Routledge.
22. Milani, Nausicaa Elena. 2012. “L’Art de penser nella logica del Système di Régis.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 5 (4): 517–55.
23. Mouy, Paul. 1934. Le développement de la physique cartésienne, 1646-1712. Paris: Vrin.
24. Parker, Samuel. 1666. A Free and Impartial Censure of the Platonick Philosophie. Oxford: Printed by W. Hall.
25. Perrault, Claude. 1680. Essais de physique. Paris: Chez Jean Baptiste Coignard.
26. Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. 1690. Système de philosophie contenant la Logique, la Métaphysique, la Physique et la Morale. Paris: Chez Anisson, Posuel et Rigaud.
27. Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. 1691. Cours entier de philosophie ou système général selon les principes de M. Descartes. Amsterdam: Aux dépens des Huguetan.
28. Rohault, Jacques. 1671. Traité de physique. Paris: Chez la veuve de Charles Savreux.
29. Roux, Sophie. 2013. “Was there a Cartesian Experimentalism in 1660s France?” In Cartesian Empiricisms, edited by Mihnea Dobre, and Tammy Nyden, 47–88. New York: Springer.
30. Roux, Sophie. 2020. “Premiers éléments d’une enquête sur Jacques Du Roure.” Archives de philosophie 83 (1): 168–80.
31. Roux, Sophie. 2021. “Une enquête sur Jacques Du Roure.” Archives de philosophie 84 (1): 174–84.
32. Schmaltz, Tad M. 2002. Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Schmaltz, Tad M. 2017. Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Schmaltz, Tad M. Forthcoming. “The Pineal Gland in Cartesianism.” In The Cartesian Brain, edited by Denis Kambouchner, Damien Lacroux, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Ruidan She. S.l.: s.n.
35. Spink, Aaron. 2018. “The Experimental Physics of Jacques Rohault.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26: 850–70.
36. Sturdy, David. J. 1995. Science and Social Status: The Members of the Académie des Sciences, 1666–1750. Woodbridge: Boydell.
37. Vieussens, Raymond. 1684. Neurographia universalis, hoc est omnium corporis humani nervorum, simul et cerebri, medullaeque spinalis descriptio anatomica. Lyon: Apud Joannem Certe.
38. Wotton, William. 1694. Reflections upon Ancient and Modern Learning. London: Printed by J. Leake.

Chapter Information

Bibliographic Information