1. Brems, Eva. 2017. “The ‘Logics’ of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights - Foundations and Rationales for Procedural Review by Supranational Courts Deciding Fundamental Rights Cases.” In Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, a cura di Gerards Janneke e Brems Eva, 17 sgg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cartabia, Marta (a cura di). 2007. I diritti in azione, Bologna: Il Mulino.
3. de Londras, Fiona. 2024. “Process-Based Review in the ‘Age of Subsidiarity’”, dicorso in occasione dell’apertura dell’anno giudiziario della Corte EDU, 26 gennaio, 2024. <https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/speech-20240126-de-londras-jy-eng>.
4. Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte. 2023. “The Evidentiary System of the European Court of Human Rights in Critical Perspective.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, 2023: 363 sgg.
5. Donati, Filippo, Milazzo, Pietro. 2003. “La dottrina del margine di apprezzamento nella giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo.” In La Corte costituzionale e le Corti d’Europa, a cura di Spadaro Antonino, Falzea Paolo e Ventura Luciano, 65 sgg. Torino: Giappichelli.
6. Esposito, Vitaliano. 2025. Dialoghi sull’ingiustizia. Antigone nel labirinto: tra aspirazione alla pace e propensione alle guerre, Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.
7. Føllesdal, Andreas, Ulfstein, Geir. 2018. “The Draft Copenhagen Declaration: Whose Responsibility and Dialogue?” EJIL: Talk!, 22 febbraio, 2018. <https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-draft-copenhagen-declaration-whose-responsibility-and-dialogue>.
8. Helfer, Laurence. 2008. “Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime.” European Journal of International Law: 125 sgg.
9. Hochmann, Thomas. 2025. “Judge Yüksel’s Way: Bad-Faith Regimes and the Dangers of Subsidiarity,” European Human Rights Law Review: 426 sgg.
10. Huijbers, Leonie. 2018. “Process-Based Fundamental Rights Review: What About the Applicant?” Montaigne Centre for Rule of Law and Administration of Justice Blog, 5 settembre, 2018. <https://blog.montaignecentre.com/en/process-based-fundamental-rights-review-what-about-the-applicant-2/>.
11. Krygier, Martin. 2012. “Rule of Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, a cura di Rosenfeld Michel e Sajò Andràs, 233 sgg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Kuijer, Martin. 2013. “The Right to a Fair Trial and the Council of Europe’s Efforts to Ensure Effective Remedies on a Domestic Level for Excessively Lengthy Proceedings”, Human Rights Law Review: 777 sgg.
13. Legg, Andrew. 2012. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law – Deference and Proportionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Lord Dyson, John Anthony. 2014. “The Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights: Now on a Firmer Footing, but is it a Sound One?” discorso presso la University of Essex, 30 gennaio, 2014. <https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Speeches/lord-dyson-speech-extraterritorial-reach-echr-300114.pdf>.
15. Lupo, Nicola, Piccirilli, Giovanni. 2012. “European Court of Human Rights and the Quality of Legislation: Shifting to a Substantial Concept of ‘Law’?” Legisprudence: 229 sgg.
16. Nascimbene, Bruno (a cura di). 2002. La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo. Profili ed effetti nell’ordinamento italiano, Milano: Giuffrè.
17. Nascimbene, Bruno. 2023. “Certezza del diritto, tutela giurisdizionale ed esecuzione delle sentenze.” Eurojus: 85 sgg.
18. Raimondi, Guido. 2025. “Il dovere di chiarezza della legge nella giurisprudenza della CEDU.” Giustizia insieme, 16 maggio, 2025. <https://www.giustiziainsieme.it/it/costituzione-e-carta-dei-diritti-fondamentali/3502-il-dovere-di-chiarezza-della-legge-nella-giurisprudenza-della-cedu-guido-raimondi>.
19. Serghides, Georgios. 2022. The Principle of Effectiveness and its Overarching Role in the Interpretation and Application of the ECHR: The Norm of All Norms and the Method of All Methods, Strasburgo.
20. Spano, Robert. 2014. “Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity.” Human Rights Law Review: 487 sgg.
21. Spano, Robert. 2018. “The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law.” Human Rights Law Review: 473 sgg.
22. Sudre, Frédéric. 2025. Droit européen et international des droits de l’homme, Parigi: Presses Universitaires de France.
23. von Staden, Andreas. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review Beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review.” International Journal of Constitutional Law: 1023 sgg.

Chapter Information

Bibliographic Information