Contained in:
Book Chapter

Multi-level structure of the First Tuesday communities after the 2000 dot-com crash: A social network analysis of economic actors based on web archives

  • Quentin Lobbé

The First Tuesday initiative began in the UK in 1998. This series of monthly meetings between IT entrepreneurs and investors played a key role in the development of the new digital economy. In this chapter, we use First Tuesday meetings as empirical proxies to analyze the social system of the economic actors who survived the 2000 dot-com crash. To this end, we delve into the raw web archives of the firsttuesday.com website in order to reconstruct the social network of First Tuesday attendees. Our analysis reveals that the First Tuesday community was, on one hand, regionally decentralized (both online and offline), but on the other hand, organized in two transnational groups of actors: the financial block and the technological block.

  • Keywords:
  • first tuesday,
  • financial web,
  • social network analysis,
  • web cernes,
  • stochastic block models,
+ Show More

Quentin Lobbé

CNRS, France - ORCID: 0000-0003-2691-5615

  1. Abélès, M. (2002). “Nouveaux riches (les): Un ethnologue dans la silicon valley“. Odile Jacob.
  2. Becker, H. S. (2008). “Art worlds: updated and expanded“. University of California Press.
  3. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks“. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008 (10), <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008> DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  4. Brandes, U. (2001). “A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality“. Journal of mathematical sociology, 25 (2), 163–177. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
  5. Chiapello, E., & Roth, C. (2025). “Socio genesis of the impact investing world in France“. In Varieties of impact investing: Creating and translating a label in local contexts.
  6. Evans, R. (2002). “E-commerce, competitiveness and local and regional governance in greater Manchester and Merseyside: A preliminary assessment“. Urban Studies, 39 (5–6), 947–975. DOI: 10.1080/00420980220128390
  7. Flichy, P. (2001). “Genèse du discours sur la nouvelle économie aux états-unis“. Revue économique, 52 (7), 379–399. DOI: 10.3917/reco.527.0379
  8. Galluzzo, Anthony. 2023. Le Mythe de l’entrepreneur: Défaire l’imaginaire de La Silicon Valley. Paris: Zones.
  9. Gardin, J.-C., & Garelli, P. (1961). “Étude par ordinateurs des établissements assyriensen cappadoce“. Annales, 16 (5), 837–876. <https://www.persee.fr/doc/ahess_0395-2649_1961_num_16_5_420758>
  10. Griffin, J. M., Harris, J. H., Shu, T., & Topaloglu, S. (2011). “Who drove and burst the tech bubble?“. The Journal of Finance, 66 (4), 1251–1290. <https://ssrn.com/abstract=459803>
  11. Kahle, B. (1997). “Preserving the internet“. Scientific American, 276 (3), 82–83. <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/preserving-the-internet/> DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican031997-4pGAwcm6xVH2Z3BjThPC6M
  12. Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. (2011). “Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks“. Physical review E , 83 (1). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016107
  13. Lobbé, Q. (2018). “Where the dead blogs are“. In International conference on asian digital libraries (pp. 112–123).
  14. Lobbé, Quentin. 2023. “Continuity and Discontinuity in Web Archives: A Multi-Level Reconstruction of the Firsttuesday Community through Persistences, Continuity Spaces and Web Cernes.” Internet Histories 7 (4): 354–85. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2023.2254050
  15. Lorrain, François, and Harrison C. White. 1971. “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 (1): 49–80. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989788
  16. Luo, T., & Mann, A. (2011). “Survival and growth of silicon valley high-tech businesses born in 2000“. Monthly Lab. Rev., 134, 16. <https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2011/09/art2full.pdf>
  17. Mann, A., & Luo, T. (2010). “Crash and reboot: Silicon valley high-tech employment and wages, 2000-08“. Monthly Lab. Rev., 133, 59. <https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2010/01/art3full.pdf>
  18. Ofek, E., & Richardson, M. (2003). “Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices“. The Journal of Finance, 58 (3), 1113–1137. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00560
  19. Peixoto, T. P. (2014). “The graph-tool python library“. figshare. Retrieved 2014-09-10. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1164194.v14
  20. Peixoto, T. P. (2021). “Descriptive vs. inferential community detection: pitfalls, myths and half-truths“. arXiv preprint. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2112.00183
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Multi-level structure of the First Tuesday communities after the 2000 dot-com crash: A social network analysis of economic actors based on web archives

Authors

Quentin Lobbé

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.21

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Exploring the Archived Web during a Highly Transformative Age

Book Subtitle

Proceedings of the 5th international RESAW conference, Marseille, June 2023

Editors

Sophie Gebeil, Jean-Christophe Peyssard

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

362

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0412-5

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0413-2

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0414-9

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-ISSN

2704-5846

1

Fulltext
downloads

2

Views

Export Citation

1,327

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,048

Book Chapters

3,631,242

Fulltext
downloads

4,271

Authors

from 898 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

64

scientific boards

from 346 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,217

Referees

from 363 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations