Contenuto in:
Capitolo

La constitution comme document politique et juridique : la généalogie du constitutionnalisme libéral américain

  • Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira

This chapter analyzes how American constitutionalism became responsible for the genesis of the notion of a constitution as the supreme legal document in a state legal order. In the 18th century, the idea of ​​the Constitution as a political document limiting public power was introduced to Europe – notably following the French Revolution – but still without a clearly present legal dimension, that is, without the possibility of judicial review of normative acts.

  • Keywords:
  • Constitutional law,
  • Constitutional History,
+ Mostra di più

Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira

Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Brazil - ORCID: 0000-0001-7085-0375

  1. Alfange Jr., Dean. 1993. “Marbury v Madison and Original Understandings of Judicial Review: In Defense of Traditional Wisdom.” The Supreme Court Review 1 : 329-446.
  2. Birkby, Robert H. 1966. “Politics of Accommodation : The Origin of the Supremacy Clause.” The Western Political Quarterly 19, 1 : 123-35.
  3. Boman, Dennis K. 2000. “The Dred Scott Case Reconsidered: The Legal and Political Context in Missouri.” The American Journal of Legal History 44, 4 : 405-28. DOI: 10.2307/3113785
  4. Bybee, Keith J. 2000. “The Political Significance of Legal Ambiguity : The Case of Affirmative Action.” Law & Society Review 34, 2 : 263-90. DOI: 10.2307/3115084
  5. Corwin, Edward S. 1914. “Marbury v. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review.” Michigan Law Review 12, 7 : 538-72.
  6. Cover, Robert M. 1982. “The Origins of Judicial Activism in the Protection of Minorities.” The Yale Law Journal 91 : 1287-316.
  7. Day, John Cocchi. 2001. “Retelling the Story of Affirmative Action : Reflections on a Decade of Federal Jurisprudence in the Public Workplace.” California Law Review 89, 1 : 59-127. DOI: 10.2307/3481173
  8. Ehrlich, Walter. 1968. “Was the Dred Scott Case Valid?” The Journal of American History 55, 2 : 256-65. DOI: 10.2307/1899556
  9. Eisgruber, Christopher L. 2003. “‘Marbury’, Marshall, and the Politics of Constitutional Judgment.” Virginia Law Review 89, 6 (Marbury v. Madison : A Bicentennial Symposium) : 1203-234. DOI: 10.2307/3202393
  10. Gomes, Joaquim Barbosa. 2001. Ação Afirmativa & Princípio Constitucional da Igualdade. A Experiência dos EUA. Rio de Janeiro : Renovar.
  11. Killenbeck, Mark R. 1999. “Pushing Things up to Their First Principles : Reflections on the Values of Affirmative Action.” California Law Review 87, 6: 1299-407.
  12. Kmiec, Keenan D. 2004. “The Origin and Current Meaning of ‘Judicial Activism’.” California Law Review 92, 5 : 1441-477.
  13. Lambert, Édouard. 2005. Le gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation sociale aux Etats-Unis (orig. 1921). Paris : Dalloz.
  14. Moses, Michele. 2001. “Affirmative Action and the Creation of More Favorable Contexts of Choice.” American Educational Research Journal 38, 1 : 3-36.
  15. Pfander, James E. 2001. “‘Marbury’, Original Jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court’s Supervisory Powers.” Columbia Law Review 101, 7 : 1515-612.
  16. Rose, Winfield H. 2003. “Marbury v. Madison : How John Marshall Changed History by Misquoting the Constitution.” Political Science and Politics 36, 2 : 209-14.
  17. Sunstein, Cass R. 1987. “Lochner’s Legacy.” Columbia Law Review 87, 5 : 873-919.
  18. Sunstein, Cass. 1996. “Foreword: Leaving the Things Undecided.” Harvard Law Review 110 : 4-101.
  19. Van Alstyne, William W., and John Marshall. 1969. “A Critical Guide to Marbury v. Madison.” Duke Law Journal 1 : 1-47.
PDF
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2025
  • Pagine: 51-62

XML
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2025

Informazioni sul capitolo

Titolo del capitolo

La constitution comme document politique et juridique : la généalogie du constitutionnalisme libéral américain

Autori

Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira

Lingua

French

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0811-6.09

Opera sottoposta a peer review

Anno di pubblicazione

2025

Copyright

© 2025 Author(s)

Licenza d'uso

CC BY 4.0

Licenza dei metadati

CC0 1.0

Informazioni bibliografiche

Titolo del libro

Constitutionnalisme transnational

Sottotitolo del libro

Histoire, ontologie et épistémologie

Autori

Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira

Opera sottoposta a peer review

Numero di pagine

284

Anno di pubblicazione

2025

Copyright

© 2025 Author(s)

Licenza d'uso

CC BY 4.0

Licenza dei metadati

CC0 1.0

Editore

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0811-6

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0810-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0811-6

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0812-3

Collana

Studi e saggi

ISSN della collana

2704-6478

e-ISSN della collana

2704-5919

0

Download dei libri

0

Visualizzazioni

Salva la citazione

1.429

Libri in accesso aperto

in catalogo

2.807

Capitoli di Libri

4.874.088

Download dei libri

5.180

Autori

da 1114 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 66 Nazioni

72

scientific boards

da 400 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 44 Nazioni

1.314

I referee

da 407 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 39 Nazioni