- Uno strumento vivente: l’impatto della CEDU sull’ordinamento italiano a 75 anni dalla sua adozione
- Edited by Lorenzo Acconciamessa, Riccardo Pavoni
La CEDU, strumento vivente da 75 anni, e l’Italia: un’introduzione
- Lorenzo Acconciamessa
- Riccardo Pavoni
- © 2026 Author(s) |
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- DOI: 10.36253/979-12-215-1086-7.03
Seventy-five years after the adoption of the European Convention on Human Rights in Rome, and more than seventy years after Italy’s ratification, the Convention remains a cornerstone of the European human rights system. This introductory chapter examines the ECHR as a ‘living instrument’ and focuses on its impact on the Italian legal order. The living instrument doctrine, developed by the European Court of Human Rights, has enabled the Convention to adapt to evolving social, political and legal realities, ensuring its continued relevance in addressing contemporary challenges. Through evolutive interpretation, the Court has progressively expanded the scope of Convention rights and contributed to the construction of a European public order based on democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. The chapter further explores the multifaceted influence of the ECHR on Italy, both at the systemic and substantive levels. It highlights the gradual incorporation of Convention standards into domestic law, the growing role of Italian courts in applying ECtHR case-law, and the Convention’s transformative effects in fields such as criminal justice, family law, gender-based violence, and migrants’ rights. While persistent difficulties in the execution of certain ECtHR judgments reveal ongoing challenges, the overall trajectory is presented as largely successful. Finally, the chapter reflects on emerging tensions in the relationship between Italy and the Convention system. Recent political initiatives advocating a restrictive interpretation of the ECHR, particularly in migration matters, raise questions about the future direction of the living instrument doctrine.
- Keywords:
- European Convention on Human Rights,
- living instrument,
- evolutive interpretation,
- European Court of Human Rights,
- domestic implementation of international law,
- Italy,
ECHR - European Court of Human Rights, France - ORCID: 0000-0001-9715-8290
University of Siena, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-0527-6607
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2024. “States’ International Obligation(s) to Repeal Domestic Legislations Incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.” EJIL:Talk!, 4 dicembre, 2024. <https://www.ejiltalk.org/states-international-obligations-to-repeal-domestic-legislations-incompatible-with-the-european-convention-on-human-rights>.
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025a. “È possibile riformare la CEDU in materia migratoria senza deformarla nel suo complesso? Sul ‘processo di riforma’ avviato il 10 dicembre 2025.” SIDIBlog, 16 dicembre, 2025. <http://www.sidiblog.org/2025/12/16/e-possibile-riformare-la-cedu-in-materia-migratoria-senza-deformarla-nel-suo-complesso-sul-processo-di-riforma-avviato-il-10-dicembre-2025>.
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025b. “L’efficacia inter-temporale dell’interpretazione evolutiva dei trattati sui diritti umani.” Rivista di diritto internazionale: 429 sgg.
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025c. “L’interpretazione della CEDU, tra universalismo, volontà degli Stati parte e indipendenza della Corte di Strasburgo: la ‘lettera aperta’ del 22 maggio 2025.” Osservatorio sulle fonti: 245 sgg.
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025d. “The Notion of ‘Shared Responsibility’ and its Radical Impact on the Relationships between the ECtHR and the Domestic Authorities.” Strasbourg Observers, 12 aprile, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/08/12/the-notion-of-shared-responsibility-and-its-radical-impact-on-the-relationships-between-the-ecthr-and-the-domestic-authorities>.
- Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2026. “The Case Law of the ECtHR in 2024: The ECHR and the Contemporary Global Challenges for the International Community.” In European Yearbook on Human Rights 2025, a cura di Czech Philip, Heschl Lisa, Lukas Karin, Nowak Manfred, Oberleitner Gerd e Tretter Hanner, 547 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
- Bernhardt, Rudolf. 1993. “The Convention and Domestic Law.” In The European System for The Protection of Human Rights, a cura di Macdonald Ronald, Matscher Franz e Petzold Herbert, 25 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
- Bianchi, Andrea, e Zarbiyev, Fuad. 2024. Demystifying Treaty Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Breuer, Marten. 2026. “Can the Living Instrument Doctrine Be Reversed?” EJIL:Talk!, 17 giugno, 2026. <https://www.ejiltalk.org/can-the-living-instrument-doctrine-be-reversed>.
- Caligiuri, Andrea, e Napoletano, Nicola. 2010. “Application of the ECHR in the Domestic Systems.” Italian Yearbook of International Law: 125 sgg.
- Candela Soriano, Mercedes. 2008. “The Reception Process in Spain and Italy.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, a cura di Keller Helen e Stone-Sweet Alec, 393 sgg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cassella, Sara. 2020. “The European Court of Human Rights and its Impact on Domestic Legal Systems.” Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental: 3 sgg.
- Di Stasi (a cura di). 2016. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2010-2015). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
- Di Stasi (a cura di). 2020. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2016-2020). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
- Di Stasi (a cura di). 2025. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2021-2025). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
- Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2020. Can the European Court of Human Rights Shape European Public Order? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2025. “Listening and Hearing: A ‘Social Contract’ Between the European Court of Human Rights and its Stakeholders.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 131 sgg.
- Frisso, Giovanna. 2015. “The Genocide Convention as a Human Rights Treaty: The Possible Contribution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice.” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals: 348 sgg.
- Jelić, Ivana, e Fritz, Etienne. 2024. “The ‘Living Instrument’ at the Service of Climate Action: The ECtHR Long-Standing Doctrine Confronted to the Climate Emergency.” Journal of Environmental Law: 142 sgg.
- Keller, Helen, e Stone-Sweet, Alec. 2008. “The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, a cura di Keller Helen e Stone-Sweet Alec, 3 sgg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kemmerer, Alexandra, e Wenzel, Nicola. 2025. “The European Convention on Human Rights at 75: Transnational Perspectives and Global Interaction.” Verfassungsblog, 5 dicembre, 2025. <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-european-convention-on-human-rights-at-75>.
- Krenc, Frédéric. 2025. “The European Convention on Human Rights: Pillars, Shifts, and Challenges.” Human Rights Law Review: 1 sgg.
- Ní Chinnéide, Harriet, e Sevrin, Eva. 2025. “Restoring Balance: A Critical Response to the Open Letter on Migration and Human Rights.” Strasbourg Observers, 17 giugno, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/06/17/restoring-balance-a-critical-response-to-the-open-letter-on-migration-and-human-rights>.
- Letsas, George. 2013. “The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy.” In Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, a cura di Føllesdal Andreas, Peters Birgit e Ulfstein Geir, 106 sgg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- O’Leary, Siofra. 2025. “Reflections on Reykjavik: Looking Back and Moving Forward.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 135 sgg.
- Pascale, Giuseppe. 2025. “I 27 Stati ‘ribelli’ potrebbero davvero invocare il mutamento delle circostanze? Ancora sul ‘processo di riforma’ della CEDU avviato il 10 dicembre 2025.” SIDIBlog, 23 dicembre, 2025. <http://www.sidiblog.org/2025/12/23/i-27-stati-ribelli-potrebbero-davvero-invocare-il-mutamento-delle-circostanze-ancora-sul-processo-di-riforma-della-cedu-avviato-il-10-dicembre-2025>.
- Pavoni, Riccardo. 2013. Interesse pubblico e diritti individuali nella giurisprudenza ambientale della Corte europea dei diritti umani. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.
- Petzold, Herbert. 1993. “The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity.” In The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, a cura di Macdonald Ronald, Matscher Franz e Petzold Herbert, 41 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
- Raimondi, Guido. 2020. “La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo ha 70 anni.” Eurojus, 7 dicembre, 2020. <https://rivista.eurojus.it/la-convenzione-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-ha-70-anni>.
- Sabato, Raffaele. 2019. “Sulla ratifica dei protocolli n. 15 e 16 della CEDU.” Sistema penale, 16 dicembre, 2019. <https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/documenti/sabato-riflessioni-ratifica-protocolli-15-e-16-cedu>.
- Saccucci, Andrea. 2018. La responsabilità internazionale dello Stato per violazioni strutturali dei diritti umani. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.
- Salmon, Jean (a cura di). 2011. “Dictionnaire de droit international public.” Bruxelles: Bruylant.
- Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre. 2024. “Adapting International Instruments over Time: Remarks on the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” In Time and International Adjudication. The Temporal Factor in Proceedings before International Courts and Tribunals, a cura di Gattini Andrea e Dimetto Marco, 473 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
- Spano, Robert. 2018. “The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law.” Human Rights Law Review: 473 sgg.
- Tassinari, Cristiano. 2023. “La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo compie 70 anni. Cosa ha fatto per noi?” Euronews, 4 settembre, 2023. <https://it.euronews.com/2023/09/04/la-convenzione-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-compie-70-anni-cosa-ha-fatto-per-noi>.
- Theil, Stefan. 2017. “Is the ‘Living Instrument’ Approach of the European Court of Human Rights Compatible with the ECHR and International Law?” European Public Law: 587 sgg.
- Tsirli, Marialena. 2025. “Developing and Maintaining a Court that Matters / Une Cour qui Compte.” Strasbourg Observers, 1° luglio, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/07/01/developing-and-maintaining-a-court-that-matters-une-cour-qui-compte>.
- Tulkens, Françoise. 2022. “Judicial Activism v Judicial Restraint: Practical Experience of This (False) Dilemma at the European Court of Human Rights.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 293 sgg.
- von Bogdandy, Armin. 2025. “The ECHR’s Contribution to European Society.” Verfassungsblog, 5 dicembre, 2025. <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-echrs-contribution-to-european-society>.
Chapter Information
Chapter Title
La CEDU, strumento vivente da 75 anni, e l’Italia: un’introduzione
Authors
Lorenzo Acconciamessa, Riccardo Pavoni
Language
Italian
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-1086-7.03
Peer Reviewed
Publication Year
2026
Copyright Information
© 2026 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Bibliographic Information
Book Title
Uno strumento vivente: l’impatto della CEDU sull’ordinamento italiano a 75 anni dalla sua adozione
Book Subtitle
Atti del Convegno tenutosi presso il Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università degli Studi di Siena il 14 novembre 2025
Editors
Lorenzo Acconciamessa, Riccardo Pavoni
Peer Reviewed
Number of Pages
284
Publication Year
2026
Copyright Information
© 2026 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Publisher Name
Firenze University Press, USiena Press
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-1086-7
ISBN Print
979-12-215-1085-0
eISBN (pdf)
979-12-215-1086-7
eISBN (epub)
979-12-215-1087-4
Series Title
Strumenti del Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza di Siena
Series ISSN
3035-5656
Series E-ISSN
3035-5842