1. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2024. “States’ International Obligation(s) to Repeal Domestic Legislations Incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.” EJIL:Talk!, 4 dicembre, 2024. <https://www.ejiltalk.org/states-international-obligations-to-repeal-domestic-legislations-incompatible-with-the-european-convention-on-human-rights>.
2. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025a. “È possibile riformare la CEDU in materia migratoria senza deformarla nel suo complesso? Sul ‘processo di riforma’ avviato il 10 dicembre 2025.” SIDIBlog, 16 dicembre, 2025. <http://www.sidiblog.org/2025/12/16/e-possibile-riformare-la-cedu-in-materia-migratoria-senza-deformarla-nel-suo-complesso-sul-processo-di-riforma-avviato-il-10-dicembre-2025>.
3. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025b. “L’efficacia inter-temporale dell’interpretazione evolutiva dei trattati sui diritti umani.” Rivista di diritto internazionale: 429 sgg.
4. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025c. “L’interpretazione della CEDU, tra universalismo, volontà degli Stati parte e indipendenza della Corte di Strasburgo: la ‘lettera aperta’ del 22 maggio 2025.” Osservatorio sulle fonti: 245 sgg.
5. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2025d. “The Notion of ‘Shared Responsibility’ and its Radical Impact on the Relationships between the ECtHR and the Domestic Authorities.” Strasbourg Observers, 12 aprile, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/08/12/the-notion-of-shared-responsibility-and-its-radical-impact-on-the-relationships-between-the-ecthr-and-the-domestic-authorities>.
6. Acconciamessa, Lorenzo. 2026. “The Case Law of the ECtHR in 2024: The ECHR and the Contemporary Global Challenges for the International Community.” In European Yearbook on Human Rights 2025, a cura di Czech Philip, Heschl Lisa, Lukas Karin, Nowak Manfred, Oberleitner Gerd e Tretter Hanner, 547 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
7. Bernhardt, Rudolf. 1993. “The Convention and Domestic Law.” In The European System for The Protection of Human Rights, a cura di Macdonald Ronald, Matscher Franz e Petzold Herbert, 25 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
8. Bianchi, Andrea, e Zarbiyev, Fuad. 2024. Demystifying Treaty Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Breuer, Marten. 2026. “Can the Living Instrument Doctrine Be Reversed?” EJIL:Talk!, 17 giugno, 2026. <https://www.ejiltalk.org/can-the-living-instrument-doctrine-be-reversed>.
10. Caligiuri, Andrea, e Napoletano, Nicola. 2010. “Application of the ECHR in the Domestic Systems.” Italian Yearbook of International Law: 125 sgg.
11. Candela Soriano, Mercedes. 2008. “The Reception Process in Spain and Italy.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, a cura di Keller Helen e Stone-Sweet Alec, 393 sgg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Cassella, Sara. 2020. “The European Court of Human Rights and its Impact on Domestic Legal Systems.” Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental: 3 sgg.
13. Di Stasi (a cura di). 2016. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2010-2015). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
14. Di Stasi (a cura di). 2020. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2016-2020). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
15. Di Stasi (a cura di). 2025. CEDU e ordinamento italiano. La giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e l’impatto nell’ordinamento interno (2021-2025). Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM.
16. Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2020. Can the European Court of Human Rights Shape European Public Order? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2025. “Listening and Hearing: A ‘Social Contract’ Between the European Court of Human Rights and its Stakeholders.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 131 sgg.
18. Frisso, Giovanna. 2015. “The Genocide Convention as a Human Rights Treaty: The Possible Contribution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice.” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals: 348 sgg.
19. Jelić, Ivana, e Fritz, Etienne. 2024. “The ‘Living Instrument’ at the Service of Climate Action: The ECtHR Long-Standing Doctrine Confronted to the Climate Emergency.” Journal of Environmental Law: 142 sgg.
20. Keller, Helen, e Stone-Sweet, Alec. 2008. “The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, a cura di Keller Helen e Stone-Sweet Alec, 3 sgg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Kemmerer, Alexandra, e Wenzel, Nicola. 2025. “The European Convention on Human Rights at 75: Transnational Perspectives and Global Interaction.” Verfassungsblog, 5 dicembre, 2025. <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-european-convention-on-human-rights-at-75>.
22. Krenc, Frédéric. 2025. “The European Convention on Human Rights: Pillars, Shifts, and Challenges.” Human Rights Law Review: 1 sgg.
23. Ní Chinnéide, Harriet, e Sevrin, Eva. 2025. “Restoring Balance: A Critical Response to the Open Letter on Migration and Human Rights.” Strasbourg Observers, 17 giugno, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/06/17/restoring-balance-a-critical-response-to-the-open-letter-on-migration-and-human-rights>.
24. Letsas, George. 2013. “The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy.” In Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, a cura di Føllesdal Andreas, Peters Birgit e Ulfstein Geir, 106 sgg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. O’Leary, Siofra. 2025. “Reflections on Reykjavik: Looking Back and Moving Forward.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 135 sgg.
26. Pascale, Giuseppe. 2025. “I 27 Stati ‘ribelli’ potrebbero davvero invocare il mutamento delle circostanze? Ancora sul ‘processo di riforma’ della CEDU avviato il 10 dicembre 2025.” SIDIBlog, 23 dicembre, 2025. <http://www.sidiblog.org/2025/12/23/i-27-stati-ribelli-potrebbero-davvero-invocare-il-mutamento-delle-circostanze-ancora-sul-processo-di-riforma-della-cedu-avviato-il-10-dicembre-2025>.
27. Pavoni, Riccardo. 2013. Interesse pubblico e diritti individuali nella giurisprudenza ambientale della Corte europea dei diritti umani. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.
28. Petzold, Herbert. 1993. “The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity.” In The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, a cura di Macdonald Ronald, Matscher Franz e Petzold Herbert, 41 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
29. Raimondi, Guido. 2020. “La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo ha 70 anni.” Eurojus, 7 dicembre, 2020. <https://rivista.eurojus.it/la-convenzione-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-ha-70-anni>.
30. Sabato, Raffaele. 2019. “Sulla ratifica dei protocolli n. 15 e 16 della CEDU.” Sistema penale, 16 dicembre, 2019. <https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/documenti/sabato-riflessioni-ratifica-protocolli-15-e-16-cedu>.
31. Saccucci, Andrea. 2018. La responsabilità internazionale dello Stato per violazioni strutturali dei diritti umani. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.
32. Salmon, Jean (a cura di). 2011. “Dictionnaire de droit international public.” Bruxelles: Bruylant.
33. Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre. 2024. “Adapting International Instruments over Time: Remarks on the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” In Time and International Adjudication. The Temporal Factor in Proceedings before International Courts and Tribunals, a cura di Gattini Andrea e Dimetto Marco, 473 sgg. Leiden: Brill.
34. Spano, Robert. 2018. “The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law.” Human Rights Law Review: 473 sgg.
35. Tassinari, Cristiano. 2023. “La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo compie 70 anni. Cosa ha fatto per noi?” Euronews, 4 settembre, 2023. <https://it.euronews.com/2023/09/04/la-convenzione-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-compie-70-anni-cosa-ha-fatto-per-noi>.
36. Theil, Stefan. 2017. “Is the ‘Living Instrument’ Approach of the European Court of Human Rights Compatible with the ECHR and International Law?” European Public Law: 587 sgg.
37. Tsirli, Marialena. 2025. “Developing and Maintaining a Court that Matters / Une Cour qui Compte.” Strasbourg Observers, 1° luglio, 2025. <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2025/07/01/developing-and-maintaining-a-court-that-matters-une-cour-qui-compte>.
38. Tulkens, Françoise. 2022. “Judicial Activism v Judicial Restraint: Practical Experience of This (False) Dilemma at the European Court of Human Rights.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review: 293 sgg.
39. von Bogdandy, Armin. 2025. “The ECHR’s Contribution to European Society.” Verfassungsblog, 5 dicembre, 2025. <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-echrs-contribution-to-european-society>.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche