Contenuto in:
Capitolo

Heritage as a Narrative Ecosystem: From Memory Twin to Territorial Memory Twin for Place-Based Valorization

  • Letizia Michelucci

This volume addresses the theme of the conservation and enhancement of submerged archaeological heritage through the case study of the ‘Terme del Lacus’ in Baia, one of Italy’s most significant submerged archaeological complexes. The research analyses the relationship between archaeology, architecture and restoration in an underwater context, examining in depth the conservation challenges posed by Roman mosaics and the delicate balance between protection and public access. Through environmental analyses, fluid dynamics simulations and parametric digital tools, the work develops a design proposal aimed at containing marine sand—a fundamental element for the protection of mosaic surfaces—integrating conservation, technical and perceptual requirements into an interdisciplinary vision of the project.

  • Keywords:
  • Digital Twin,
  • Cultural heritage,
  • Place-based valorization,
  • Transmedia storytelling,
  • Risk communication,
+ Mostra di più

Letizia Michelucci

“Gabriele d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy - ORCID: 0009-0009-2943-4690

  1. Aveta, Aldo, and Bianca Gioia Marino. 2017. “La fruizione come problema di conservazione: la sperimentazione di un modello critico per la valorizzazione di Castel Nuovo.” In Castel Nuovo in Napoli. Ricerche integrate e conoscenza critica per il progetto di restauro e di valorizzazione, edited by Aldo Aveta, 14–29. Napoli: Artstudiopaparo.
  2. Bruno, Anna, and Roberta Spallone. 2015. “Cultural-Heritage Conservation and Communication by Digital Modeling Tools: Case Studies Minor Architectures of the Thirties in the Turin Area.” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-5/W3: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-25-2015. DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-25-2015
  3. Cassar, Alison, Drew Baker, and Marinos Ioannides. 2025. “From Digital Twin to Memory Twin: A Holistic Framework for Cultural Heritage Documentation, Interpretation, and Adaptive Reuse.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLVIII-M-9: 203–9. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-203-2025. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-203-2025
  4. Feng, Huiling, Linqing Ma, Tianjiao Qi, and Wenhong Zhou. 2024. “Digital Memory Construction for Cultural Heritage: Methodology and Applications in China.” In Digital Memory Construction for Cultural Heritage, 155–75. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032707211-10. DOI: 10.4324/9781032707211-10
  5. Giaccardi, Elisa, and Leysia Palen. 2008. “The Social Production of Heritage through Cross-Media Interaction: Making Place for Place-Making.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 14, 3: 281–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953827. DOI: 10.1080/13527250801953827
  6. Ham, Sam H. 2013. Interpretation: Making a Difference on Purpose. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.
  7. ICOMOS, UNESCO, and IPCC. 2023. Global Research and Action Agenda on Culture, Heritage and Climate Change. Paris: ICOMOS.
  8. Ioannides, Marinos, Elena Karittevli, Panayiotis Panayiotou, and Drew Baker. 2025. “Beyond Digital Twins: Introducing the Memory Twin for Cultural Heritage.” In EVA Berlin 2025, edited by Bienert et al., 91–97. Heidelberg: arthistoricum.net. https://doi.org/10.11588/arthistoricum.1568.c24046. DOI: 10.11588/arthistoricum.1568.c24046
  9. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
  10. Jones, David, Chris Snider, Aydin Nassehi, Jason Yon, and Ben Hicks. 2020. “Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 29: 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
  11. Lieto, Antonio, and Rossana Damiano. 2013. “Building Narrative Connections among Media Objects in Cultural Heritage Repositories.” In Interactive Storytelling, edited by Hartmut Koenitz et al., 257–60. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_31
  12. Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Minguzzi, Antonio, and Ludovico Solima. 2012. “Relazioni virtuose tra patrimonio culturale, turismo e industrie creative a supporto dei processi di sviluppo territoriale.” In Il territorio come giacimento di vitalità per l’impresa. XXIV Convegno annuale di Sinergie, 641–54. Lecce: Università del Salento.
  14. Nappi, Maria Laura, Mario Buono, Camelia Chivăran, and Rosa Maria Giusto. 2024. “Models and Tools for the Digital Organisation of Knowledge: Accessible and Adaptive Narratives for Cultural Heritage.” Heritage Science 12: 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01219-z. DOI: 10.1186/s40494-024-01219-z
  15. Orzechowski, Michał, Łukasz Opioła, Ignacio Lamata Martínez, Marinos Ioannides, Panayiotis N. Panayiotou, Łukasz Dutka, Renata G. Słota, and Jacek Kitowski. 2026. “Integrated Data, Metadata, and Paradata Management System for 3D Digital Cultural Heritage Objects: Workflow Automation, Federated Authentication, and Publication.” Future Generation Computer Systems 174: 107964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.107964. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2025.107964
  16. Pavlidis, George. 2025. “Agentic AI for Cultural Heritage: Embedding Risk Memory in Semantic Digital Twins.” Computers 14, 7: 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070266. DOI: 10.3390/computers14070266
  17. Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4, 1: 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
  18. Simon, Nina. 2010. The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0.
  19. Thomas, Helen, Valentina Marincioni, and Scott Allan Orr. 2025. “Multi-Determinant Climate Change Risk Assessment for Heritage: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Needs.” Climate Risk Management 49: 100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100727. DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2025.100727
  20. Tilden, Freeman. 1957. Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  21. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2023. Policy Document on Climate Action for World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/204421.
  22. Younus, Iqbal, Wahda Al-Hinkawi, and Sabeeh Farhan. 2024. “The Role of Digital Documentation of Architectural Heritage (Photogrammetry) in Enhancing the Cultural Resistance of Cities: Al-Basha Mosque in the Old City of Mosul – A Case Study.” Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning 23, 2: 18–32. https://doi.org/10.36041/iqjap.2024.145163.1093. DOI: 10.36041/iqjap.2024.145163.1093
PDF
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2026
  • Pagine: 2900-2926

XML
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2026

Informazioni sul capitolo

Titolo del capitolo

Heritage as a Narrative Ecosystem: From Memory Twin to Territorial Memory Twin for Place-Based Valorization

Autori

Letizia Michelucci

Lingua

Inglese

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-1113-0.124

Opera sottoposta a peer review

Anno di pubblicazione

2026

Copyright

© 2026 Author(s)

Licenza d'uso

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Licenza dei metadati

CC0 1.0

Informazioni bibliografiche

Titolo del libro

ReUso 2026 - New heritage and future strategies. Perspectives on conservation and promotion

Sottotitolo del libro

14th International Congress Barcelona-Girona, 4-7 November

Curatori

Alessandro Scarnato, Marisa García Vergara, Ángeles Layuno Rosas

Opera sottoposta a peer review

Anno di pubblicazione

2026

Copyright

© 2026 Author(s)

Licenza d'uso

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Licenza dei metadati

CC0 1.0

Editore

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-1113-0

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-1113-0

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-1112-3

Collana

ReUso

0

Download dei libri

0

Visualizzazioni

Salva la citazione

1.530

Libri in accesso aperto

in catalogo

3.867

Capitoli di Libri

6.674.567

Download dei libri

6.258

Autori

da 1241 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 69 Nazioni

83

scientific boards

da 417 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 46 Nazioni

1.439

I referee

da 400 Istituzioni e centri di ricerca

di 41 Nazioni