1. Aloisio, Angelo, Yue Wang, R. Crocetti, A. Q. Nyrud, and Roberto Tomasi. 2021. “Mechanical Performance of Pure-Wood Moment-Resisting Ridge Joints with Plywood Gussets and Wooden Dowels.” Engineering Structures 231. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120271
2. CMSA. 2026. “Palazzo del Podestà di Mantova.” Realizzazioni. https://www.cmsa.it/realizzazioni/palazzo-del-podesta-di-mantova/. (2026-04-22)
3. Derikvand, Mohammad, and Donya Bazyar Khoshroodi. 2025. “Experimental and Analytical Evaluation of Shear Capacity of Reclaimed Timber Connections with Thermo-Mechanically Densified Wooden Dowels.” Construction and Building Materials 465. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144613
4. Ehrhart, Thomas, Philippe Grönquist, Maximilian Westermayr, et al. 2025. “Timber Trusses: (Dis-)assembly and Performance of Different Node Types Regarding Reuse.” Bautechnik 102. DOI: 10.1002/bate.202500033
5. European Commission. “Buildings and Construction.” Single Market Scoreboard. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/sustainability/build-ings-and-construction_en. (2026-04-22)
6. European Commission. “Energy Efficiency in Buildings.” News and Media. 17 febbraio 2020. https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/focus-ener-gy-efficiency-buildings-2020-02-17_it. (2026-04-22)
7. European Parliament. 2015. “Economia circolare: definizione, importanza e vantaggi.” Note tematiche sull’Unione Europea. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/to-pics/it/article/20151201STO05603/economia-circolare-definizione-importanza-e-vantaggi. (2026-04-22)
8. Gorgolewski, Mark. 2008. “Designing with Reused Building Components: Some Challenges.” Building Research & Information36, n. 2: 175-188. DOI: 10.1080/09613210701559499
9. Hansen, Søren Gustenhoff, Anja Kunic, and Roberto Naboni. 2021. “A Reversible Connection for Robotic Assembly of Timber Structures.” Engineering Structures 243. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112795
10. Infobuilding Energia. 2021. “Edilizia reversibile e circolare.” Approfondimenti. http://www.infobuildenergia.it/approfondimenti/edilizia-reversibile-circolare/. (2026-04-22)
11. Istituto Restauro Roma. 2023. “I principi chiave dell’attività di restauro.” Notizie dal Settore del Restauro. S.d. https://www.istitutorestauroroma.it/notizie-dal-set-tore-del-restauro/28-i-principi-chiave-dellattivit-di-restauro.html.Laasonen, S., e S. Pajunen. “Assessment of Load-Bearing Timber Elements for the Design for Disassembly.” Buildings13, n. 7. (2026-04-22)
12. Laasonen, Sonja, and Sami Pajunen. 2023. “Assessment of Load-Bearing Timber Elements for the Design for Disassembly.” Buildings13, n. 7. DOI: 10.3390/buildings13071878
13. Li, Zhengyao, and Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis. 2022. “Limited-damage 3D-printed Interlocking Connection for Timber Volumetric Structures: Experimental Validation and Computational Modelling.” Journal of Building Engineering 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105373
14. Ministero della Cultura. “Recupero del Castello di Rivoli.” Atlante Architettura Contemporanea. https://atlantearchitetturacontemporanea.cultura.gov.it/recupe-ro-del-castello-di-rivoli/. (2026-04-22)
15. Modulo. “Capannone 18, Area ex Officine Reggiane.” Realizzazioni. https://mo-dulo.net/it/realizzazioni/capannone-18. (2026-04-22)
16. Ottenhaus, Lisa-Mareike, Zidi Yan, Reinhard Brandner, et al.. 2023. “Design for Adaptability, Disassembly and Reuse – A Review of Reversible Timber Connection Systems.” Construction and Building Materials 392. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132823
17. Polastri, Andrea, and Riccardo Fanti. 2025. “Round Shaped Connectors: A New Connection System for CLT and Hybrid Structures.” Construction and Building Materials 461. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142944
18. Pozzi, L. E. 2019-20. “Design for Disassembly with Structural Timber Connections. Analysis and Assessment of Different Connection Systems Used in Engineered Timber Building Structures to Maximise Demountability and Reuse of the Elements.” Laurea magistrale, University of Technology of Delft.
19. PRISMA Group.S.a. “PRISMA Statement: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.” https://www.prisma-statement.org. (2026-04-22)
20. Schwarze, R., Max Braun, Werner Seim, et al. 2021. “Application and Potential of Shape Memory Alloys for Dowel-type Connections in Timber Structures.” In International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 15. DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2021.1920625
21. Tenório, Marina, Rui Ferreira, Victor Belafonte, et al. 2024. “Contemporary Strategies for the Structural Design of Multi-Story Modular Timber Buildings: A Comprehensive Review.” Applied Sciences 14, n. 8. DOI: 10.3390/app14083194
22. Tomasi, Roberto, Yuri De Santis, Angelo Aloisio, et al. 2025. “Experimental and Analytical Investigation on Timber Connections with Beech, Birch and Laminated Densified Wooden Dowels.” In Construction and Building Materials 460. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142692
23. URGES Architettura. 2024. “Riqualificazione dei centri storici: strategie e innovazione.” https://www.urgesarchitettura.com/riqualificazione-dei-centri-storici-strategie-e-innovazione/. (2026-04-22)
24. Wang, Shuo, Jingkang Lin, Feibin Wang, et al. 2024. “Mechanical Behavior and Theoretical Modeling of Wooden Nails Under Various Stress Conditions.” Construction and Building Materials 442. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139624
25. Wooddays. 2024 “Wood and Climate.” https://www.wooddays.eu/it/wood-and-climate/index.html. (2026-04-22)
26. Yan, Zidi, Lisa-Mareike Ottenhaus, Paola Leardini, and Robert Jockwer. 2022.“Performance of Reversible Timber Connections in Australian Light Timber Framed Panelised Construction.” Journal of Building Engineering 59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105244
27. Zambrano-Jaramillo, Juan S., e Erica C. Fischer. 2024. “A Review of Inter-Modular Connections for Volumetric Cross-Laminated Timber Modular Buildings.” Buildings 14, n. 1. DOI: 10.3390/buildings16010078

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche