Contained in:
Book Chapter

Cross-linguistic considerations on preverb stacking (with special reference to Bulgarian)

  • Alessio Muro

The term preverb stacking (PS) designates the co-occurrence on one verbal base of two or more prefixes bearing spatial, aspectual, or quantificational meanings. The phenomenon is especially productive in Slavic but is also attested in other Indo-European and non-Indo-European languages. This paper provides a first attempt at a cross-linguistic typology of PS. It will also pay attention to problems typical of Slavic (i.e. the interaction of PS and the aspectual value of the verb in terms of the typical Slavic perfective vs. imperfective dichotomy). Special attention will be paid to Bulgarian.

  • Keywords:
  • Preverbs,
  • verbal prefixes,
  • stacking,
  • aspect,
  • Bulgarian,
+ Show More

Alessio Muro

Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea (the Republic of) - ORCID: 0000-0003-2794-7686

  1. Atanasova, A.N. 2011. Poliprefigirani glagoli v săvremennija bălgarski knižoven ezik (Ph.D. diss.). Bӑlgarska Akademija na Naukite.
  2. Baker, M.C. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford.
  3. Casad, E.H. 1982. Cora Locationals and Structured Imagery (Ph.D. diss.). University of California, San Diego.
  4. Casad, E.H. 1984. Cora, in Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan grammatical sketches. R.W. Langacker (ed.). Arlington (TX): 155-459.
  5. Casad, E.H., Langacker, R.W. 1985. “‘Inside’ and ‘outside’, in Cora grammar”. International Journal of American Linguistics, 51.3: 247-281.
  6. Imbert, C. 2010. “Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: a typological insight”. CogniTextes, 4. <http://cognitextes.revues.org/387#text>.
  7. Istratkova, V. 2004. “On Multiple Prefixation in Bulgarian”. Nordlyd, 32.2: 301-321. <http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/issue/view/8>.
  8. Ludwig, J. 1995. Multiply Prefixed Verbs in Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian (Ph.D. diss.). Indiana University.
  9. Mithun, M.M. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge.
  10. Nevins, J.A. Joseph, B.D. 1993. “Wackernagel affixes: evidence from Balto-Slavic”. Yearbook of Morphology 1992: 93-111.
  11. Papke, J.K.P. 2010. Classical Sanskrit Preverb Ordering: A Diachronic Study (Ph.D. diss.). Ohio State University.
  12. Rojzenzon, L.I. 1974. Mnogopristavočnye glagoly v russkom i drugich slavjanskich jazykach. Samarkand.
  13. Smith, C.S. 1991/1996. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht.
  14. AA.VV. 1970. Slovar’ russkich narodnych govorov, vol. 6. Leningrad.
  15. Tatevosov, S. 2008. “Intermediate prefixes in Russian” in Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 2007. A. Antonenko, C. Bethin, J. Baylin (eds.). Ann Arbor: 423-442.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2017
  • Pages: 137-152
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2017 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2017
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2017 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Cross-linguistic considerations on preverb stacking (with special reference to Bulgarian)

Authors

Alessio Muro

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/978-88-6453-698-9.10

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2017

Copyright Information

© 2017 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality

Book Subtitle

Issues of grammaticalization

Editors

Rosanna Benacchio, Alessio Muro, Svetlana Slavkova

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

272

Publication Year

2017

Copyright Information

© 2017 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-6453-698-9

ISBN Print

978-88-6453-697-2

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-6453-698-9

eISBN (xml)

978-88-9273-128-8

Series Title

Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici

Series ISSN

2612-7687

Series E-ISSN

2612-7679

213

Fulltext
downloads

275

Views

Export Citation

1,347

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,262

Book Chapters

3,790,127

Fulltext
downloads

4,421

Authors

from 923 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

65

scientific boards

from 348 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,248

Referees

from 380 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations