1. Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. 1785. n. 295, 13 (December): 298–99.
2. Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen. 1782. 3, 19 (Januar): 40–8.
3. Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1985 (1794). “Review of Aenesidemus.” In Between Kant and Hegel, edited and translated by George Di Giovanni, 136–57. New York: State University of New York Press.
4. Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. 2009 (1787). “David Hume”, The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, edited and translated by George Di Giovanni, 253–338. Montreal & Kingston: McGill Queen’s University Press.
5. Kant, Immanuel. 1997 (17811/17872). Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer, and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Kant, Immanuel. 1996 (1783). Immanuel Kant’s Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: in focus, edited by Beryl Logan. London-New York: Routledge.
7. Kant, Immanuel. 2000 (1790). Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Paul Guyer, translated by Paul Guyer, and Eric Matthews. Cambridge University Press.
8. Meier, Georg Friedrich. 2016 (1752). Excerpt from the Doctrine of Reason, translated by Aaron Bunch. Londo-New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
9. Pope, Alexander. 2009 (1728). Perì Bathous, or The Art of Sinking in Poetry. London: Oneworld Classics.
10. Schulze, Gottlob Ernst. 1969 (1792). Aenesidemus oder über die Fundamente der von dem Herrn Prof. Reinhold in Jena gelieferten Elementar-Philosophie: nebst einer Vertheidigung des Skepticismus gegen die Anmassungen der Vernunftkritik. Bruxelles: Culture et Civilisation.
11. Schultz, Johann. 1995. (1791). Exposition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, translated with an introduction by James C. Morrison. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
12. Ulrich, Johann August Heinrich. 1785. Institutiones logicae et metaphysicae. Jena: Cröcker.
13. Allais, Lucy. 2015. Manifest Reality. Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Allison, Henry E. 1983. Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense. London: Yale University Press (new edition revised and enlarged edition, London: Yale University Press, 2004).
15. Allison, Henry E. 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. An Analytical-Historical Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Arnoldt, Emil. 1879. “Kants Prolegomena nicht doppelt redigiert. Widerlegung der B. Erdmann Hypothese.” Altpreussische Monatsschrift 16: 1–79.
17. Beiser, Frederick. 2002. German Idealism. The Struggle Against Subjectivism 1781–1801. Harvard University Press.
18. Bonelli Munegato, Cristina. 1992. Johann Schultz e la prima recezione del criticismo kantiano. Trento: Verifiche.
19. Bouveresse, Jacques. 1991. “Le Problème de l’a priori et la conception évolutionniste des lois de la pensée.” Revue de théologie et de philosophie 123: 353–68.
20. Cohen, Alix. 2006. “Kant on epigenesis, monogenesis and human nature: The biological premises of anthropology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences 37: 675–93. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369848606000719>.
21. Demarest, Boris. 2017. “Kant’s epigenesis: specificity and developmental constraints.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39, 1 (March): 1–19.
22. Erdmann, Benno. 1878. “Einleitung des Herausgebers. ” In Immanuel Kant, Prolegomena zu jener künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, I–CXIV. Leipzig: Voss.
23. Fiorilli, Mattia. 2024. Esperienza e trascendentale. La conoscenza antropologica come condizione della morale kantiana. Pisa: ETS.
24. Förster, Eckart. 2000. Kant’s Final Synthesis. An Essay on the Opus postumum. London: Cambridge University Press.
25. Genova, Anthony C. 1974. “Kant’s Epigenesis of Pure Reason.” Kant-Studien 65, 3: 259–73.
26. Genova, Anthony C. 1975. “What Kant Did Not Mean.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6, 1: 105–13.
27. Guyer, Paul. 1983. “Kant’s Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism.” Philosophical Review 92: 329–83.
28. Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hinske, Norbert. 1970. Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie: der dreißigjährige Kant. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
30. Hohenegger, Hans-Michael. 1996. Introduzione a Immanuel Kant, Prolegomeni a ogni futura metafisica che voglia presentarsi come scienza, a cura di Hans-Michael Honegger, traduzione di Pantaleo Carabellese, V–XXXIX. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
31. Ingensiep, Hans Werner. 1994. “Die biologischen Analogien und die erkenntistheoretischen Alternativen in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft B§27.” Kant-Studien 85, 4: 381–93.
32. Kemp Smith, Norman. 1962 (1918). A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Humanities Press.
33. Langton, Rea. 1998. Kantian Humility. Our ignorance of things in themselves. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Sensibility and Discursivity in Kant’s Transcendental Analytic in the Critique of Pure Reason, translated from the French by Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press.
35. Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2000. “Kant’s Categories and the Capacity to Judge: Responses to Henry Allison and Sally Sedgwick.” Inquiry 43: 91–110. DOI: 10.1080/002017400321398
36. Lorini, Gualtiero. 2017. Fonti e lessico dell’ontologia kantiana. I Corsi di Metafisica (1762-1795). Pisa: ETS.
37. Malabou, Catherine. 2014. Avant demain. Épigenèse et rationalité. Paris: PUF.
38. Marcucci, Silvestro. 1991. “Categorie e finalità nella concezione kantiana della scienza.” Studi kantiani 4: 11–36.
39. Marcucci, Silvestro. 1996. “Kant e il concetto di natura.” Studi kantiani 9: 11–25.
40. Marcucci, Silvestro. 2010. “Le ‘scienze della vita’ nella Physische Geographie di Kant.” In Silvestro Marcucci, Studi su Kant. Natura, Teleologia, Mondo, a cura di Claudio La Rocca, 121–42. Pisa: ETS.
41. Morawski, Tommaso. 2024. Mappe della ragione. Kant e la medialità dell’immaginazione cartografica. Macerata: Quodlibet.
42. Rosefeldt, Tobias. 2013. “Dinge an sich und der Außenweltskeptizismus. Über ein Missverständnis der frühen Kant-Rezeption.” In Self, World, Art. Metaphysical Topics in Kant and Hegel, edited by Dina Emundts, 221–59. Berlin-Boston: Walter De Gruyter.
43. Rosefeldt, Tobias. 2022. “Being Realistic about Kant’s Idealism.” In The Sensible and the Intelligible Worlds. New Essays on Kant’s Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by Karl Schafer, and Nicolas F. Stang. Oxford academic, online edition.
44. Rumore, Paola. 2007. L’ordine delle idee. La genesi del concetto di «rappresentazione» in Kant e nelle sue fonti wolffiane (1747-1787). Firenze: Le Lettere.
45. Sandkaulen, Birgit. 2019. “Das »leidige Ding an sich«. Kant – Jacobi – Fichte.” In Jacobis Philosophie. Über den Widerspruch zwischen System und Freiheit, 169–97. Hamburg: Meiner.
46. Sgarbi, Marco, edited by. 2025. Philosophical Reviews in German Territories (1668-1799). Firenze: Firenze University Press. http: DOI: 10.36253/979-12-215-0573-3
47. Strawson, Peter Frederik. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen & Co.
48. Tommasi, Francesco Valerio. 2009. Philosophia transcendentalis. L’analogia tra la Scolastica e Kant, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.
49. Tonelli, Giorgio. 1987. Da Leibniz a Kant: saggi sul pensiero del Settecento, a cura di Claudio Cesa. Napoli: Prismi.
50. Uehling, Theodor E. 1971. Notion of form in Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. The Hague-Paris: Mouton.
51. Uehling, Theodor E. 1996. “Wahrnehmungsurtheile and Erfahrungsurtheile reconsidered.” In Immanuel Kant’s Prolegomena to any future metaphysics in focus, edited by Beryl Logan, 226–40. London: Routledge.
52. Wubnig, Judy. 1969. “The Epigenesis of Pure Reason: A Note on the Critique of Pure Reason, B sec. 27, 165–167.” Kant-Studien 60, 2: 147–52.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche