1. Acker, Amelia, and Adam Kriesberg. 2017. ‘Tweets May Be Archived: Civic Engagement, Digital Preservation and Obama White House Social Media Data’. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54 (1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401001
2. Bates, Marcia J. 2009. ‘An Introduction to Metatheories, Theories, and Models’. Library and Information Science 11 (444): 275–97.
3. Baym, Nancy K. 2010. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
4. Ben-David, Anat. 2016. ‘What Does the Web Remember of Its Deleted Past? An Archival Reconstruction of the Former Yugoslav Top-Level Domain’. New Media & Society 18 (7): 1103–19. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816643790
5. Ben-David, Anat. 2020. ‘Counter-Archiving Facebook’. European Journal of Communication 35 (3): 249–64. DOI: 10.1177/0267323120922069
6. Bonacchi, Chiara. 2022. Heritage and Nationalism: Understanding Populism through Big Data. UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1wdvx2p
7. Borji, Samaneh, Amir Reza Asnafi, and Maryam Pakdaman Naeini. 2022. ‘A Comparative Study of Social Media Data Archiving Software’. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture 51 (3): 111–19. DOI: 10.1515/pdtc-2022-0013
8. Brügger, Niels. 2005. Archiving Websites: General Considerations and Strategies. Aaarhus: Center for Internetforskning.
9. Brügger, Niels. 2018. The Archived Web: Doing History in the Digital Age. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
10. Brügger, Niels, and Ditte Laursen. 2019. The Historical Web and Digital Humanities: The Case of National Web Domains. Routledge.
11. Brügger, Niels, and Ralph Schroeder, eds. 2017. The Web as History: Using Web Archives to Understand the Past and the Present. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781911307563
12. Bruns, Axel. 2019. ‘After the “APIcalypse”: Social Media Platforms and Their Fight against Critical Scholarly Research’. Information, Communication & Society 22 (11): 1544–66. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
13. CCSDS. 2012. ‘Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)’. Recommended Practice. Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS).
14. Cook, Terry. 2013. ‘Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms’. Archival Science 13 (2–3): 95–120. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
15. Dallas, Costis. 2007. ‘An Agency-Oriented Approach to Digital Curation Theory and Practice’. In The International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting Proceedings, edited by Jennifer Trant and David Bearman. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. <http://www.archimuse.com/ichim07/papers/dallas/dallas.html>
16. Dallas, Costis. 2016. ‘Digital Curation beyond the “Wild Frontier”: A Pragmatic Approach’. Archival Science 16 (4): 421–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-015-9252-6
17. Dallas, Costis. 2018. ‘Heritage Encounters on Social Network Sites, and the Affiliative Power of Objects’. In Culture and Perspective at Times of Crisis: State Structures, Private Initiative and the Public Character of Heritage, edited by Sophia Antoniadou, Ioannis Poulios, George Vavouranakis, and Pavlina Raouzaiou, 116–31. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
18. Edwards, Adam, William Housley, Matthew Williams, Luke Sloan, and Malcolm Williams. 2013. ‘Digital Social Research, Social Media and the Sociological Imagination: Surrogacy, Augmentation and Re-Orientation’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16 (3): 245–60. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2013.774185
19. Engeström, Yrjö. 1999. ‘Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation’. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Yrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen, and Raija-Leena Punamäki-Gitai, 19–37. Learning in Doing. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fiesler, Casey, and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. ‘“Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics’. Social Media + Society 4 (1): 205630511876336. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118763366
21. franzke, aline shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess, and Association of Internet Researchers. 2020. ‘Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0 Association of Internet Researchers’. Association of Internet Researchers. <https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf>
22. Garton, Laura, Caroline Haythornthwaite, and Barry Wellman. 1997. ‘Studying Online Social Networks’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1): 0–0. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00062.x
23. Grace, Stephen, Gareth Knight, and Lynne Montague. 2009. ‘Investigating the Significant Properties of Electronic Content over Time (InSPECT) - Final Report’. London: King’s College London. <https://significantproperties.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/inspect-finalreport.pdf>
24. Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge (Mass.) : Harvard University Press.
25. Helmond, Anne, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2019. ‘Social Media and Platform Historiography: Challenges and Opportunities’. TMG–Journal for Media History 22 (1). DOI: 10.18146/tmg.434
26. Hemphill, Libby, Susan H. Leonard, and Margaret Hedstrom. 2018. ‘Developing a Social Media Archive at ICPSR’. In In Proceedings of Web Archiving and Digital Libraries (WADL’18). New York: ACM. <http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/143185>
27. Hockx-Yu, Helen. 2014. ‘Archiving Social Media in the Context of Non-Print Legal Deposit’. In . Lyon. <https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/999/>
28. Kelpšienė, Ingrida. 2021. ‘Participatory Heritage: A Multiple-Case Study of Lithuanian Grassroots Cultural Heritage Communities on Facebook’. Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius University. DOI: 10.15388/vu.thesis.181
29. Kelpšienė, Ingrida, Donata Armakauskaitė, Viktor Denisenko, Kęstas Kirtiklis, Rimvydas Laužikas, Renata Stonytė, Lina Murinienė, and Costis Dallas. 2023. ‘Difficult Heritage on Social Network Sites: An Integrative Review’. New Media & Society 25 (11): 3137–64. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221122186
30. Kietzmann, Jan H., Kristopher Hermkens, Ian P. McCarthy, and Bruno S. Silvestre. 2011. ‘Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media’. Business Horizons 54 (3): 241–51.
31. Kirtiklis, Kęstas, Rimvydas Laužikas, Ingrida Kelpšienė, and Costis Dallas. 2023. ‘An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites’. SAGE Open 13 (3): 1–25. DOI: 10.1177/21582440231187367
32. Littman, Justin, Daniel Chudnov, Daniel Kerchner, Christie Peterson, Yecheng Tan, Rachel Trent, Rajat Vij, and Laura Wrubel. 2018. ‘API-Based Social Media Collecting as a Form of Web Archiving’. International Journal on Digital Libraries 19 (1): 21–38. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0201-7
33. Lomborg, Stine. 2012. ‘Researching Communicative Practice: Web Archiving in Qualitative Social Media Research’. Journal of Technology in Human Services 30 (3–4): 219–31. DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2012.744719
34. Lomborg, Stine, and Anja Bechmann. 2014. ‘Using APIs for Data Collection on Social Media’. The Information Society 30 (4): 256–65. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2014.915276
35. Lotman, Juri. 2005. ‘On the Semiosphere’. Translated by Wllma Clark. Σημειωτική-Sign Systems Studies, no. 1: 205–29.
36. Manca, Stefania. 2020. ‘Bridging Cultural Studies and Learning Science: An Investigation of Social Media Use for Holocaust Memory and Education in the Digital Age’. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 43 (3). <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10714413.2020.1862582> DOI: 10.1080/10714413.2020.1862582
37. Marres, Noortje, and Esther Weltevrede. 2013. ‘Scraping the Social?: Issues in Live Social Research’. Journal of Cultural Economy 6 (3): 313–35. DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
38. McKemmish, Sue. 1997. ‘Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility’. In Proceedings of the Records Management Association of Australia 14th National Convention, 15–17 Sept. 1997. Perth, Western Australia: RMAA. <http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-smckp2.html>
39. Michel, Alejandra, Jessica Pranger, Friedel Geeraert, Sven Lieber, Peter Mechant, Eveline Vlassenroot, Sally Chambers, Julie Birkholz, and Fien Messens. 2021. ‘WP1 Report: An International Review of Social Media Archiving Initiatives’. Report. <https://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/7741>
40. Milligan, Ian, Nick Ruest, and Jimmy Lin. 2016. ‘Content Selection and Curation for Web Archiving: The Gatekeepers vs. the Masses’. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 107–10. Newark New Jersey USA: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2910896.2910913
41. Ogden, Jessica, and Emily Maemura. 2021. ‘“Go Fish”: Conceptualising the Challenges of Engaging National Web Archives for Digital Research’. International Journal of Digital Humanities 2 (1–3): 43–63. DOI: 10.1007/s42803-021-00032-5
42. Papacharissi, Zizi, ed. 2011. A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
43. Pehlivan, Zeynep, Jérôme Thièvre, and Thomas Drugeon. 2021. ‘Archiving Social Media: The Case of Twitter’. In The Past Web: Exploring Web Archives, edited by Daniel Gomes, Elena Demidova, Jane Winters, and Thomas Risse, 43–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63291-5_5
44. Perriam, Jessamy, Andreas Birkbak, and Andy Freeman. 2020. ‘Digital Methods in a Post-API Environment’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23 (3): 277–90. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840
45. Robinson, Ian, Jim Webber, and Emil Eifrem. 2015. Graph Databases: New Opportunities for Connected Data. O’Reilly Media.
46. Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001
47. Rutten, Ellen. 2013. ‘Why Digital Memory Studies Should Not Overlook Eastern Europe’s Memory Wars’. In Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe, edited by Uilleam Blacker and Alexander Etkind, 219–31. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. <http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137322067_11>
48. Schäfer, Mirko Tobias, and Karin van Es, eds. 2017. The Datafied Society. Studying Culture through Data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. <http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31843> DOI: 10.5117/9789462981362
49. Shibuya, Yuya, Andrea Hamm, and Teresa Cerratto Pargman. 2022. ‘Mapping HCI Research Methods for Studying Social Media Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review’. Computers in Human Behavior 129. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107131
50. Snelson, Chareen L. 2016. ‘Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 15 (1): 1609406915624574. DOI: 10.1177/1609406915624574
51. Social Media Lab, Toronto Metropolitan University. 2024. ‘Social Media Research Toolkit’. Social Media Lab (blog). January 2024. <https://socialmedialab.ca/apps/social-media-research-toolkit-2/>
52. Stieglitz, Stefan, Milad Mirbabaie, Björn Ross, and Christoph Neuberger. 2018. ‘Social Media Analytics – Challenges in Topic Discovery, Data Collection, and Data Preparation’. International Journal of Information Management 39 (Complete): 156–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002
53. Stoycheff, Elizabeth, Juan Liu, Kunto A. Wibowo, and Dominic P. Nanni. 2017. ‘What Have We Learned about Social Media by Studying Facebook? A Decade in Review’. New Media & Society 19 (6): 968–80. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817695745
54. Thomson, Sara Day. 2017. ‘Preserving Social Media: Applying Principles of Digital Preservation to Social Media Archiving’. In Researchers, Practitioners and Their Use of the Archived Web, 1–13. London: School of Advanced Study, University of London. DOI: 10.14296/resaw.0007
55. Thomson, Sara Day, and William Kilbride. 2015. ‘Preserving Social Media: The Problem of Access’. New Review of Information Networking 20 (1–2): 261–75. DOI: 10.1080/13614576.2015.1114842
56. Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven ; London: Yale University Press.
57. Upward, Frank, Sue McKemmish, and Barbara Reed. 2011. ‘Archivists and Changing Social and Information Spaces: A Continuum Approach to Recordkeeping and Archiving in Online Cultures’. Archivaria 72 (January): 197–237.
58. Vlassenroot, Eveline, Sally Chambers, Emmanuel Di Pretoro, Friedel Geeraert, Gerald Haesendonck, Alejandra Michel, and Peter Mechant. 2019. ‘Web Archives as a Data Resource for Digital Scholars’. International Journal of Digital Humanities 1: 85–111.
59. Vlassenroot, Eveline, Sally Chambers, Sven Lieber, Alejandra Michel, Friedel Geeraert, Jessica Pranger, Julie Birkholz, and Peter Mechant. 2021. ‘Web-Archiving and Social Media: An Exploratory Analysis’. International Journal of Digital Humanities 2 (1): 107–28. DOI: 10.1007/s42803-021-00036-1
60. Voss, Alex, Ilia Lvov, and Sara Day Thomson. 2017. ‘Data Storage, Curation and Preservation’. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, edited by Luke Sloan and Anabel Quan-Haase, 161–76. SAGE Publications Ltd London. <https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5018794&publisher=FZ7200#page=190>
61. Weller, Katrin. 2014. ‘What Do We Get from Twitter—and What Not? A Close Look at Twitter Research in the Social Sciences’. Knowledge Organization 41 (3): 238–48. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2014-3-238
62. Wilson, Steven Lloyd. 2022. Social Media as Social Science Data. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108677561
63. Winters, Jane. 2017. ‘Coda: Web Archives for Humanities Research–Some Reflections’. In The Web as History: Using Web Archives to Understand the Past and Present, edited by Niels Brügger and Ralph Schroeder, 238–48. London: UCL Press.
64. Zimmer, Michael, and Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda. 2017. Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Challenges, Cases, and Contexts. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Chapter Information

Bibliographic Information