Contained in:
Book Chapter

Traduzioni e riusi del «Grillo» di Plutarco nel Rinascimento fiorentino: Machiavelli e Gelli

Plutarch’s works were well known in the Florentine Renaissance, and were translated into Italian many times. The mythical dialogue Gryllus was highly appreciated and imitated. Machiavelli, the famous writer, repeatedly refers to it in his unfinished satyrical poem entitled L’Asino (The Ass), which takes the cue from Dante’s Divina Commedia and Apuleius’ Golden Ass. This paper discusses several quotations showing mockeries of Plutarch’s work. Besides, it briefly illustrates G. B. Gelli’s Circe, a perfectly complete prose work with extensive reminiscences of the Plutarchean dialogue.

  • Keywords:
  • Plutarch’s Gryllus,
  • Florentine Renaissance,
  • Machiavelli’s L’Asino,
  • Gelli’s Circe,
+ Show More
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2025
  • Pages: 71-82
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2025 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2025
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2025 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Traduzioni e riusi del «Grillo» di Plutarco nel Rinascimento fiorentino: Machiavelli e Gelli

Authors

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6.09

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2025

Copyright Information

© 2025 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

I miei scritti su Plutarco

Book Subtitle

Raccolti, riveduti e corretti con bibliografia unificata

Authors

Angelo Casanova

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

366

Publication Year

2025

Copyright Information

© 2025 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0823-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0824-6

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0825-3

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

0

Fulltext
downloads

0

Views

Export Citation

1,433

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,843

Book Chapters

4,978,357

Fulltext
downloads

5,182

Authors

from 1115 Research Institutions

of 66 Nations

73

scientific boards

from 401 Research Institutions

of 44 Nations

1,314

Referees

from 407 Research Institutions

of 39 Nations