1. Binkley M., Erstad O., Herman J., Raizen S., Ripley M., Miller-Ricci M. and Rumble M. 2012, Defining twenty-first century skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, Springer, Berlin, 17-66.
2. Brown A.L. 1992, Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings, «The Journal of The Learning Sciences», II (2), 141-178.
3. Cole M. 1996, Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
4. Collins A. 1992, Toward a Design Science of Education, «New Directions in Educational Technology», 15-22.
5. Design-Based Research Collective 2003, Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry, «Educational Researcher», XXXII (1), 5-8.
6. Engeström Y. 1987, Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki.
7. Hakkarainen K.P., Palonen T., Paavola S. and Lehtinen E. 2004, Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives, Emerald, London.
8. Hakkarainen K.P. and Paavola S. 2009, Toward a trialogical approach to learning, «Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction», 65-80.
9. Muukkonen H., Lakkala M., Toom A. and Ilomäki L. 2016, Assessment of competences in knowledge work and object-bound collaboration during higher education courses, Higher Education Transitions: Theory and Research. EARLI book series New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction.
10. Paavola S., Engeström R. and Hakkarainen K. 2010, Trialogical approach as a new form of mediation, in Morsh A., Moen A. and Paavola S. (eds.) Collaborative knowledge creation: Practices, tools, and concepts, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 9-23.
11. Paavola S. and Hakkarainen K. 2014, Trialogical approach for knowledge creation, «Knowledge creation in education», 53-73.
12. Paavola S., Lakkala M., Muukkonen H., Kosonen K. and Karlgren K. 2011, The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning, «Research in Learning Technology», XIX (3), 233-246.
13. Paavola S., Lipponen L. and Hakkarainen K. 2004, Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning, «Review of Educational Research», LXXIV (4), 557-576.
14. Pozzi F., Persico D. and Dimitriadis Y. 2012, 15. Tecniche e strategie per strutturare la collaborazione in una KBC in rete, «Qwerty-Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education», VI (2), 179-200.
15. Sansone N., Cesareni D. and Ligorio M.B. 2016, Il Trialogical Learning Approach per rinnovare la didattica, «TD Tecnologie Didattiche», XXIV (2), 82-91, DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/892
16. Schellens T. and Valcke M. 2006, Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups, «Computers & Education», XLVI (4), 349-370.
17. Sfard A. 1998, On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One, «Educational Researcher», XXVII (2), 4-13.
18. Vygotsky L.S. 1981, The genesis of higher mental functions, in Wertsch J.V. (ed.) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology, Sharpe, Armonk.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche