This essay explores the reciprocal contamination of the notions of error and erring at the beginning of the early modern time in Latin and Romance languages, through the example of the concept of “erroneous conscience”. This concept, for Pierre Bayle and those who followed him at least on this point, allows for the decriminalization of religious beliefs, and even those that challenge religion(s), by recognizing the “rights of the erroneous conscience”. This right is a right to error and to erring/wandering limited to religious convictions and apparently aimed solely at “tolerance” (supporting and excusing erroneous/wandering opinions). However, it did not escape contemporaries that it radically challenged the very idea that a universal truth could be universally known and established in this field.
École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales - EHESS, France - ORCID: 0000-0002-0528-5100
Titolo del capitolo
The Notions of Erroneous Conscience in Pierre Bayle
Autori
Jean-Pierre Cavaillé
Lingua
Italian
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0266-4.08
Opera sottoposta a peer review
Anno di pubblicazione
2023
Copyright
© 2023 Author(s)
Licenza d'uso
Licenza dei metadati
Titolo del libro
Errors, False Opinions and Defective Knowledge in Early Modern Europe
Autori
Marco Faini, Marco Sgarbi
Opera sottoposta a peer review
Numero di pagine
145
Anno di pubblicazione
2023
Copyright
© 2023 Author(s)
Licenza d'uso
Licenza dei metadati
Editore
Firenze University Press
DOI
10.36253/979-12-215-0266-4
ISBN Print
979-12-215-0265-7
eISBN (pdf)
979-12-215-0266-4
eISBN (epub)
979-12-215-0267-1
Collana
Knowledge and its Histories