Contained in:
Book Chapter

Solidarietà: un principio generale del diritto internazionale?

  • Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi

The main question is whether solidarity constitutes a general principle of international law. Scholars are divided on the issue; and this depends on two factors: a) differences in the meaning given to the concept of solidarity; b) differing theories on the nature of general principles of international law. On the first point, the theories that identify solidarity with cooperation are not convincing, and one must instead adhere to a more restrictive concept. On the second point, three different categories of general principles must be admitted. Investigating some regulatory areas potentially relevant to solidarity, we conclude that the principle has a binding nature in some areas, is programmatic in others, and finally does not operate in other fields.

  • Keywords:
  • International law,
  • general principles,
  • peace,
  • human rights,
  • environment,
+ Show More

Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi

University of Siena, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-9823-2747

  1. Alvarez, Alexandre. 1912. La codification du droit international: ses tendances; ses bases. Paris: Éditions Internationales.
  2. Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2010. “Responsibility to Protect: Reflecting Solidarity?” In Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law, a cura di Wolfrum Rüdiger, e Chie Kojima, 93-110. Heidelberg: Springer.
  3. Campanelli, Danio. 2011. “Principle of Solidarity”. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (online) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>.
  4. Casini, Lorenzo. 2014. “Solidarity Between States in the Global Legal Space.” European Review of Public Law 26: 91-115.
  5. Charney, Jonathan I.1993. “Universal International Law.” American Journal of International Law 87: 529-551.
  6. de Vattel, Emmeric. 1758. Le droit de gens, ou principes de la loi naturelle: Appliqués à la conduit et aux affaires des Nations et des Souverains, vol. 1, Leiden.
  7. de Vitoria, Francisco. 1532. Sobre el derecho de guerra de los españoles en los bárbaros (De Jure belli Hispanorum in barbaros), Madrid.
  8. Delbruck, Jost. 2012. “The International Obligation to Cooperate – An Empty Shell or a Hard Principle of International Law? – A Critical Look at a Much Debated Paradigm of Modern International Law.” In Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, a cura di Holger P. Hestermeyer, e Rüdiger Wolfrum, Vol. I, 3-16. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  9. Dominicé, C. (2013) “La société internationale à la recherche de son équilibre, Cours Général de Droit International Public.” Recueil des Cours 370: 9-392.
  10. Duguit, L. 1908. Le droit social, le droit individuel et la transformation de l’état. Paris : Librairie Félix Alcan.
  11. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. 2002. “L’unité de l’ordre juridique international, Cours Général de droit international public.” Recueil des Cours 297: 9-490.
  12. Gorobets, Kostiantyn. 2022. “Solidarity as a Practical Reason: Grounding the Authority of International Law.” Netherlands International Law Review 69: 3-27.
  13. Henkin, Louis. 1995-1996. “Human Rights and State Sovereignty.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 25: 31- 45.
  14. Hestermeyer, Holger P., e Rüdiger Wolfrum, a cura di. 2012. Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (2 voll.). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  15. Koroma, Abdul G. 2012. “Solidarity : Evidence of an Emerging International Legal Principle.” In: Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, a cura di Holger P. Hestermeyer, e Rüdiger Wolfrum, vol. I, 103-129. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  16. Koskenniemi, Martti. 2002. “Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order?” British Year Book of International Law 72: 337-356.
  17. Kotzur, Markus. 2017. “Solidarity as a Legal Concept.”. In Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis, a cura di Andreas Grimmel e My Giang Susanne 37-45. New York: Springer.
  18. Lammers, Johan G. 1980. “General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations.” In Essays on the Development of the International Legal Order, a cura di Frits Kalshoven, Pieter Jan Kuyper e Johan G Lammers 53-75. Alpen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
  19. MacDonald, Ronald St. John. 1996. “Solidarity in the Practice and Discourse of Public International Law.” Pace International Law Review 8: 259-302.
  20. Pasquali, Leonardo, a cura di. 2022. Solidarity in International Law: Challenges, Opportunities and The Role of Regional Organizations. London-New York-Torino: Routledge-Giappichelli.
  21. Pasquali, Leonardo. 2022. “Introduction. Solidarity: traditional international law vs. modern international law and universal international law vs. law of regional organizations.” In Solidarity in International Law: Challenges, Opportunities and The Role of Regional Organizations, a cura di Leonardo Pasquali, 1-22. London-New York-Torino: Routledge-Giappichelli.
  22. Pisillo Mazzeschi, Riccardo. 2021. International Human Rights Law. Theory and Practice, Cham: Springer-Giappichelli.
  23. Pisillo Mazzeschi, Riccardo e Alessandra Viviani. 2018. “General Principles of International Law: From Rules to Values?” In Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law, a cura di Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi, e Pasquale De Sena, 113-161. Cham: Springer.
  24. Scelle, Georges. 1935. “Théorie du gouvernement international” Annuaire de l’Institut International de Droit Public 41-112.
  25. Simma, Bruno. 1994. “From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law.” Recueil des Cours 250: 217-384.
  26. Simma, Bruno e Philip Alston. 1992. “The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens and General Principles.” American Journal of International Law 12: 82-108.
  27. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. “Security, Solidarity, and Sovereignty: The Grand Themes of UN Reform.” American Journal of International Law 99: 619-631.
  28. Tomuschat, Christian. 1999. “International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century. General Course on Public International Law.” Recueil des Cours 281: 9-438.
  29. Tzimas, Themistoklis. 2019. “Solidarity as a Principle of International Law: Its Application in Consensual Intervention.” Groningen Journal of International Law 6: 333-359.
  30. Van Boven, Theo. 2011. “The Right to Peace as an Emerging Solidarity Right.” In Evolving Principles of International Law: Studies in Honour of Karel C. Wellens, a cura di Eva Rieter, e Henri de Waele, 137-147. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
  31. Vašák, Karel. 1984. “Pour une troisième génération des droits de l’homme.” In Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, a cura di Christhophe Swiniarsky 837-850. Geneva -The Hague: International Committee of the Red Cross - Martinus Nijhoff.
  32. Verdross, Alfred. 1968. “Les principes généraux de droit dans le système des sources du droit international public.” In: Receuil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim. Genève: Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Genève/Institut Universitaire des Hautes Études Internationales, 521-530.
  33. Villani, Ugo. 2017. “Immigrazione e principio di solidarietà.” Freedom, Security and Justice: European Legal Studies 3: 1-4.
  34. Wellens, Karel C. 2005. “Solidarity as a Constitutional Principle: Its Expanding Role and Inherent Limitations.” In Towards World Constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community, a cura di Ronald St John Mac Donald, e Douglas M Johnston, 775-807. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  35. Wellens, Karel C. 2010. “Revisiting Solidarity as a (Re-)emerging Constitutional Principle: Some Further Reflections.” In Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law, a cura di Rüdiger Wolfrum, e Chie Kojima 3-38. Heidelberg: Springer.
  36. Williams, Angela 2009. “Solidarity, Justice and Climate Change Law.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 10: 493-508.
  37. Wolfrum, Rüdiger. 2006. “Solidarity amongst States: An Emerging Structural Principle of International Law.” In Völkerrecht als Wertordnung/Common Values in International Law : Festschrift für/Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat, a cura di Pierre-Marie Dupuy et al., 1087-1101. Kehl: Engel Verlag.
  38. Wolfrum, Rüdiger. 2009. “Solidarity amongst States: An Emerging Structural Principle of International Law.” Indian Journal of International Law 49:8-20.
  39. Wolfrum, Rüdiger. 2010a. “Concluding Remarks.” In Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law, a cura di Rüdiger Wolfrum, e Chie Kojima, 225-228. Heidelberg: Springer.
  40. Wolfrum, Rüdiger. 2010b. “International Law of Cooperation.” In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>.
  41. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, e Chie Kojima, a cura di. 2010. Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law. Heidelberg: Springer.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 159-177

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Solidarietà: un principio generale del diritto internazionale?

Authors

Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0368-5.15

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-SA 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Le dimensioni del principio solidaristico nel terzo millennio

Editors

Laura Castaldi, Federico Lenzerini, Francesco Zini

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

200

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-SA 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press, USiena Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0368-5

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0367-8

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0368-5

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0369-2

Series Title

Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze politiche e internazionali

43

Fulltext
downloads

69

Views

Export Citation

1,346

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,262

Book Chapters

3,790,127

Fulltext
downloads

4,420

Authors

from 923 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

65

scientific boards

from 348 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,248

Referees

from 381 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations