1. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 2004. “Dubium Perfectissimum: The Skepticism of the ‘Subtle Arriaga’.” In Scepticism as a Force in Renaissance and Post-Renaissance Thought. New Interpretations, edited by José Raimundo Maia Neto, and Richard H. Popkin, 107–21. Amherst-New York: Humanity Books.
2. Arriaga, Rodrigo de. 1632. Cursus philosophicus. Antwerp: Ex officina Plantiniana Balthasaris Moreti.
3. Bolliger, Daniel. 2020. Methodus als Lebensweg bei Johann Conrad Dannhauer: Existentialisierung der Dialektik in der lutherischen Orthodoxie. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
4. Brosch, Pius. 1926. Die Ontologie des Johannes Clauberg: eine historische Würdigung und eine Analyse ihrer Probleme. Greifswald: Emil Hartmann.
5. Bruyère, Nelly. 2000. Méthode et dialectique dans l’œuvre de La Ramée. Paris: Vrin.
6. Bühler, Pierre. 2006. “L’herméneutique de Johann Conrad Dannhauer.” In La logique hérmeneutique du XVIIe siècle, J.-C. Dannhauer et J. Clauberg, sous la direction de Jean-Claude Gens, 69–192. Argenteuil: Collection Phéno.
7. Carraud, Vincent. 1999. “L’ontologie peut-elle être cartésienne? L’exemple de l’Ontosophia de Clauberg, de 1647 à 1664: de l’ens à la mens.” In Johannes Clauberg (1622–1665) and Cartesian Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Theo Verbeek, 13–38. Dordrecht: Springer.
8. Cellamare, Davide, and Mattia Mantovani, edited by. 2022. Descartes in the Classroom: Teaching Cartesian Philosophy in the Early Modern Age. Dordrecht: Brill.
9. Clauberg, Johannes. 1654. Logica vetus et nova quadripartita. Amsterdam: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.
10. Clauberg, Johannes. 1658. Logica vetus et nova […]. Editio secunda mille locis emendata, novisque Prolegomenis aucta. Amsterdam: Ex officina Elzeviriana.
11. Clauberg, Johannes. 1691. Opera omnia philosophica. Amsterdam: Ex typographia P. et T. Blaev.
12. Clauberg, Johannes. 2007. Logique ancienne et nouvelle, édité et traduit par Jacqueline Lagrée, et Guillaume Coqui. Paris: Vrin.
13. Collacciani, Domenico. 2020. “Devenir cartésien? La méthode de l’ontologie de Gerhard de Neufville à Johann Clauberg.” Les études philosophiques 134 (3): 37–58.
14. Del Prete, Antonella. 2013. “Y-a-t-il une interprétation cartésienne de la Bible? Le cas de Christoph Wittich.” In Qu’est-ce qu’être cartésien?, sous la direction de Delphine Kolesnik-Antoine, et Denis Kambouchner, 117–42. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
15. Descartes, René. 1964–19742 (1897–1913). Oeuvres, éditées par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery, édition révue par Joseph Beaude, Pierre Costabel, Alan Gabbey, et Bernard Rochot (“AT”). Paris: J. Vrin.
16. Descartes, René. 1984–1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volumes 1–2, edited and translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch (“CSM”); volume 3, edited and translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny (“CSMK”). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Douglas, Alexander. 2014. “Christoph Wittich’s Anti-Spinoza.” Intellectual History Review 24 (2): 153–66.
18. Eberhardt, Kai-Ole. 2015. Christoph Wittich (1625–1687). Reformierte Theologie unter dem Einfluss von René Descartes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
19. Ehrenpreis, Stefan. 2005. “Reformed Education in Early Modern Europe: A Survey.” Nederlands archief voor kerkgeschiedenis / Dutch Review of Church History 85: 39–51.
20. Ferrater Mora, José. 1963. “On the Early History of ‘Ontology’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (1): 36–47.
21. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1989. Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference. Oxford-London: Clarendon Press.
22. Gilbert, Neal Ward. 1960. Renaissance Concepts of Method. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Hamid, Nabeel. 2020. “Domesticating Descartes, Renovating Scholasticism: Johann Clauberg and the German Reception of Cartesianism.” History of Universities 30 (2): 57–84.
24. Hood, Jane. 2010. “Galen’s Aristotelian Definitions.” In Definition in Greek Philosophy, edited by David Charles, 450–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hotson, Howard. 2007. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1543–1630. New York-London: Oxford University Press.
26. Hotson, Howard. 2020. The Reformation of Common Learning: Post-Ramist Method and the Reception of the New Philosophy, 1618–1670. New York-London: Oxford University Press.
27. Hotson, Howard. 2022. “The Philosophical Fulcrum of Seventeenth-Century Leiden: Pedagogical Innovation and Philosophical Novelty in Adriaan Heereboord.” In Descartes in the Classroom: Teaching Cartesian Philosophy in the Early Modern Age, edited by Davide Cellamare, and Mattia Mantovani, 34–59. Dordrecht: Brill.
28. Jaroszyński, Piotr. 2018. Metaphysics or Ontology?, translated by Hugh McDonald. Dordrecht: Brill.
29. Keckermann, Bartholomäus. 1601. Systema logicae, compendiosa methodo adornatum pro iis, quorum captus artem breuem ac facilem desiderat. Hannover: Apud Guilielmum Antonium.
30. Leinsle, Ulrich G. 1999. “Comenius in der Metaphysik des jungen Clauberg.” In Johannes Clauberg (1622–1665) and Cartesian Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Theo Verbeek, 1–12. Dordrecht: Springer.
31. Lelong, Frédéric. 2021. “L’héritage de la politesse humaniste dans la logique cartésienne de Johann Clauberg.” Dix-septième siècle 293 (4): 481–505.
32. Lukaš, Mirko, and Emerik Munjiza. 2014. “Education System of John Amos Comenius and its Implications.” Život i škola 31 (1): 32–44.
33. Maas, Joerg F. 1995. Novitas Mundi: Die Ursprünge moderner Wissenschaft in der Renaissance. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.
34. Maclean, Ian. 2017. “Language in the Mind: Reflexive Thinking in the Late Renaissance.” In Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, edited by Constance Blackwell, 296–321. London: Routledge.
35. Mehl, Édouard. 2005. “Descartes critique de la logique pure.” Les études philosophiques 75 (4): 485–500.
36. Omodeo, Pietro Daniel. 2022. Defending Descartes in Brandenburg-Prussia: The University of Frankfurt an der Oder in the Seventeenth Century. Cham: Springer.
37. Ong, Walther. 1958. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
38. Pätzold, Detlev. 1999. “Johannes Claubergs Behandlung des Kausalitätsproblems in der 1. und 3. Auflage seiner Ontosophia.” In Johannes Clauberg (1622–1665) and Cartesian Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Theo Verbeek, 123–34. Dordrecht: Springer.
39. Pozzo, Riccardo. 2012. Adversus Ramistas: Kontroversen über die Natur der Logik am Ende der Renaissance. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.
40. Ragni, Alice. 2016. “Ontologia e analogia entis tra Johannes Clauberg e Jacob Thomasius.” Archivio di filosofia 84: 55–166.
41. Ragni, Alice. 2019. “Johannes Clauberg and the Search for the Initium Philosophiae. The Recovery of (Cartesian) Metaphysics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 466–80. New York-London: Oxford University Press.
42. Rossi, Paolo. 2000. Logic and the Art of Memory: The Quest for a Universal Language, translated by Stephen Clucas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Sadler, John Edward. 1966. Comenius and the Concept of Universal Education. London: Routledge.
44. Savini, Massimiliano. 2006. “L’insertion du cartésianisme en logique: la Logica vetus & nova de Johannes Clauberg.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 49 (1): 73–88.
45. Savini, Massimiliano. 2009. “Johannes Clauberg e l’esito cartesiano dell’ontologia.” Quaestio 9: 153–72.
46. Savini, Massimiliano. 2011. Johannes Clauberg. Methodus cartesiana et ontologie. Paris: Vrin.
47. Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. 1983. Topica universalis: eine Modellgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft. Hamburg: Meiner.
48. Schuurman, Paul. 2004. Ideas, Mental Faculties and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and Its Reception in the Dutch Republic, 1630–1750. Leiden: Brill.
49. Sepper, Dennis L. 1996. Descartes’ Imagination. Berkely-Los Angeles-London: California University Press.
50. Sgarbi, Marco. 2013. The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism. Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles (1570–1689). New York: Springer.
51. Sgarbi, Marco. 2016. Kant and Aristotle: Epistemology, Logic, and Method. Albany: State University of New York Press.
52. Sgarbi, Marco. 2018. “Renaissance Facultative Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The ‘Cognitive Turn’.” In  Philosophy of Mind in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance, edited by Stephan Schmid, 270–90. New York-London: Routledge.
53. Smith, Justin E. H. 2013. “Heat, Action, Perception: Models of Living Beings in German Medical Cartesianism.” In Cartesian Empiricisms, edited by Mihnea Dobre, and Tammy Nyden, 105–23. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London: Springer.
54. Strazzoni, Andrea. 2012. “The Dutch Fates of Bacon’s Philosophy: Libertas Philosophandi, Cartesian Logic and Newtonianism.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 4 (1): 251–81.
55. Strazzoni, Andrea. 2014. “Tying the Double Metaphysics of Johannes Clauberg: Ontosophia and Rational Theology.” In Filosofia e religione. Studi in onore di Fabio Rossi, a cura di Stefano Caroti, e Alberto Siclari, 156–87. Parma: E-theca On Line OpenAccess Edizioni. DOI: 10.14640/QuadernidiNoctua2-5
56. Strazzoni, Andrea. 2018. Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110569698
57. Timpler, Clemens. 1612. Logicae systema methodicum. Hannover: Typis haeredum Guilielmi Antonii.
58. Tozza, Elisabetta. 1998. “Rodrigo de Arriaga e l’aristotelismo.” Atti della Academia pontiniana 47: 297–308.
59. Trevisani, Francesco. 2006. “Clauberg et l’Aristote réformé.” In La logique hérmeneutique du XVIIe siècle, J.-C. Dannhauer et J. Clauberg, sous la direction de Jean-Claude Gens, 93–116. Argenteuil: Collection Phéno.
60. Van Bunge, Wiep. 2019. “The Early Dutch Reception of Cartesianism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 417–33. New York-London: Oxford University Press.
61. Verbeek, Theo. 1999. “Johannes Clauberg: A Bio-biographical Sketch.” In Johannes Clauberg (1622–1665) and Cartesian Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Theo Verbeek, 181–99. Dordrecht: Springer.
62. Verbeek, Theo. 2022. “Descartes and the Classroom.” In Descartes in the Classroom: Teaching Cartesian Philosophy in the Early Modern Age, edited by Davide Cellamare, and Mattia Mantovani, 17–33. Dordrecht: Brill.
63. Wilson, Emma Annette, and Steven J. Reid, edited by. 2011. Ramus, Pedagogy and the Liberal Arts: Ramism in Britain and the Wider World. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche