1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), pp. 716-723.
2. Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., Fabbris, L, Robusto, E., Scioni, M., (2021). Measuring content validity of academic psychological capital and locus of control in fresh graduates, in ASA 2021 Statistics and Information Systems for Policy Evaluation, Vol. 127, eds. B. Bertaccini, L. Fabbris, and A. Petrucci, Firenze University Press, Firenze, (IT), pp. 23-28.
3. Baron, R.A., Franklin, R.J., Hmieleski, K.M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital. Journal of Management, 42(3), pp. 742-768.
4. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press, New York, (NY).
5. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., Huyvaert, K.P. (2011). AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), pp. 23-35.
6. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), pp. 233-255.
7. Choisay, F., Fouquereau, E., Coillot, H., Chevalier, S. (2021). Validation of the French Psychological Capital Questionnaire (F-PCQ-24) and its measurement invariance using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework. Military Psychology, 33(1), pp. 50-65.
8. Dawkins, S., Martin, A., Scott, J., Sanderson, K. (2013). Building on the positives: A psychometric review and critical analysis of the construct of psychological capital. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(3), pp. 348-370.
9. Flora, D.B., Curran, P.J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, pp. 466-491.
10. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), pp. 541-572.
11. Luthans, K.W., Luthans, B.C., Palmer, N.F. (2016). A positive approach to management education: The relationship between academic PsyCap and student engagement. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), pp. 1-22.
12. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesistesting approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), pp. 320-341.
13. McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Approach. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, (NJ).
14. Muthén, B.O., Muthén, L.K. (2012). Mplus Version 7: User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, (CA).
15. Olatunji, B.O., Ebesutani, C., Tolin, D.F. (2019). A bifactor model of obsessive beliefs: Specificity in the prediction of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), pp. 210-225.
16. Reise, S.P., Bonifay, W.E., Haviland, M.G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), pp. 129-140.
17. Reise, S.P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K.F., Haviland, M.G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, pp. 5-26.
18. Revelle, W., Zinbarg, R.E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), pp. 145-154.
19. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P.É., Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), pp. 354-373.
20. Robusto, E., Maeran, R., Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., Scioni, M. (2019). Development of two scales for measuring academic psychological capital and locus of control in fresh graduates. Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(1), pp. 13-28.
21. Rodriguez, A., Reise, S.P., Haviland, M.G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), pp. 137-150.
22. Seligman, M.E., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction, in Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, ed. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Springer, Dordrecht, (NL), pp. 279-298.
23. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), pp. 107-120.
24. Ten Berge, J.M., Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), pp. 613-625.
25. Youssef, C.M., Luthans, F. (2005). Resiliency development of organizations, leaders and employees: Multi-level theory building for sustained performance, in Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development (Monographs in leadership and management, Vol. 3), eds. W. Gardner, B. Avolio, and F. Walumbwa, Elsevier, Oxford, (UK), pp. 303-343.
26. Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. (2007). Estimating ω h for structures containing two group factors: Perils and prospects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(2), pp. 135-157.
27. Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), pp. 123-133.

Informazioni sul capitolo

Informazioni bibliografiche