1. Berti, I. 2017. Writing Matters: Presenting and Perceiving Monumental Inscriptions. Berlin.
2. Bier, L. 2011. The Bouleuterion at Ephesos. Wien.
3. Chaniotis, A. 2015. “Archival Research, Formulaic Language, and Ancient Forgeries of Legal Documents”, in A. P. Matthaiou and N. Papazarkadas (eds.), Axon: Studies in Honour of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens, 669-692.
4. Cooley, A. 2012. “From Document to Monument: Inscribing Roman Official Documents in the Greek East”, in J.K. Davies and J. Wilkes (eds.), Epigraphy and the Historical Sciences. Oxford, 159-182.
5. Cooley, A. 2014. “Paratextual Perspectives upon SC de Piso patre”, in L. Jansen (ed.), The Roman Paratext. Frame, Text, and Reader. Cambridge, 143-155.
6. Corbier, M. 2013. “Writing in Public Space”, in G. Sears, P. Keegan, and R. Laurence (eds.), Written Space in the Latin West, 200 BC to AD 300. London, 13-48.
7. Davies, J. K. 2004. “Greek Archives: From Record to Monument”, in M. Brosius (ed.), Ancient Archives and Archival Traditions: Concepts of Record Keeping in the Ancient World. Oxford, 323-343.
8. De Chaisemartin, N. et D. Theodorescu. 2017. Aphrodisias VIII. Le Théâtre d’Aphrodisias: les structures sceniques. Wiesbaden.
9. Dehaene, S. 2009. Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read. New York.
10. Eastmond, A. 2015. Viewing Inscriptions in the Late Antique and the Medieval World. Cambridge.
11. Graham, A.S. 2013. “The Word is not Enough: A New Methodology for Assessing Monumental Inscriptions”, AJA 116, 384-411.
12. Graham, A.S. 2017. “The Power of Images at Aphrodisias: How Digital Resources Can Transform our Assessment of Palaeography”, in S. Orlandi, R. Santucci, F. Mambrini, and P.M. Liuzzo (eds.), Digital and Traditional Epigraphy in Context. Rome, 367-390.
13. Graham, A.S. 2018. “Re-appraising the Value of Same Text Relationships: A Study of “Duplicate” Inscriptions in the Monumental Landscape at Aphrodisias”, in A. Petrovic and E. Thomas (eds.), The Materiality of Text: Placements, Presences and Perceptions of Inscribed Texts in Classical Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, 275-302.
14. Graham, A.S. 2021. “Cognitive Approaches to Reading the Archive Wall at Aphrodisias”, AJA 125, 571-601.
15. Hansen, M. H. 2001. “What is a Document: An Ill-defined Type of Source”, C&M 52, 317-343.
16. Jansen, L. 2014. The Roman Paratext. Frame, Text, and Reader. Cambridge.
17. Kalinowski, A. 2021. Memory, Family and Community in Roman Ephesos. Cambridge.
18. Kokkinia, C. 2003. “Letters of Roman Authorities to Local Dignitaries: The Case of Vedius Antoninus”, ZPE 142, 191-213.
19. Kokkinia, C. 2005. “Making Sense of an Odd Inscription: MAMA VIII, 430 and the ‘Nail Tax’”, ZPE 151, 259-262.
20. Kokkinia, C. 2016. “The design of the ‘Archive Wall’ at Aphrodisias”, Tekmeria 13, 9-55.
21. Kokkinia, C. 2021 “On the Inscribing in Stone of Augustus’ Res Gestae”, ZPE 220, 281-289.
22. Ma, J. 2012 “Epigraphy and Displays of Authority”, in J.K. Davies and J. Wilkes (eds.), Epigraphy and the Historical Sciences. Oxford, 133-158.
23. Panciera, S. 2012. “What is an Inscription? Problems of Definition and Identity of an Historical Source”, ZPE 183, 1-10.
24. Petrovic, A. and E. Thomas. 2018. The Materiality of Text: Placements, Presences and Perceptions of Inscribed Texts in Classical Antiquity. Leiden-Boston.
25. Reynolds, J. 1982. Aphrodisias and Rome. London.
26. Reynolds, J. 1991. “Epigraphic Evidence for the Construction of the Theatre: 1st to mid 3rd c. AD”, in K.T Erim and R.R.R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 2. Ann Arbor, 15-28.
27. Reynolds, J. 2000. “New Letters from Hadrian to Aphrodisias: Trials, Taxes, Gladiators, and an Aqueduct”, JRA 13, 1-20.
28. Reynolds, J., C. Roueché, and G. Bodard. 2007. The Inscriptions of Aphrodisias. http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/iaph2007/index.html.
29. Reynolds, J. 2008 “The Inscriptions of the Basilica”, in C. Ratté and R.R.R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments (JRA Supplement 70). Portsmouth, RI, 133-140.
30. Sarri, A. 2018. Material Aspects of Letter Writing in the Graeco-Roman world. Berlin.
31. Sitz, A. 2019. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Epigraphic Reuse in the Temple-Church at Aphrodisias”, JLA 12, 136-168.
32. Small, P. 2008. “Visual Copies and Memory”, in A. Mackay (ed.), Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World (Mnemosyne Supplement 298). Boston, 227-251.
33. Slater, N. 2008 “Orality and Autobiography”, in A. Mackay (ed.), Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World (Mnemosyne Supplement 298). Boston, 253-273.
34. Stinson, P. 2008. “The Civil Basilica: Urban Context, Design, and Significance,” in C. Ratté and R.R.R. Smith (eds.), Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments (JRA Supplement 70). Portsmouth, RI, 79-106.
35. Stinson, P. 2012. “Local Meanings of the Civil Basilica at Aphrodisias: Image, Text, and Monument”, in L. Cavalier (ed.), Atelier d’architecture antique. Les basiliques civiles en Grèce et en Asie Mineure. Bordeaux, 107-126.
36. Stinson, P. 2016. Aphrodisias VII. The Civil Basilica. Wiesbaden.
37. Thornton, J. 2008. “Qualche osservazione sulle lettere di Adriano ad Afrodisia (SEG 50, 2000, 1096 = AE 2000, 1441)”, in M. L. Caldelli, G. L. Gregori, and S. Orlandi (eds.), Epigrafia 2006. Atti della XIVe Rencontre sur l’Epigraphie in onore di Silvio Panciera con altri contributi di colleghi, allievi e collaboratori. Rome, 913-934.
38. Willingham, D.T. 2017. The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to How the Mind Reads. San Francisco.

Chapter Information

Bibliographic Information